News Corp shareholders accuse Murdoch of nepotism over Shine deal

News Corp is being sued by two of its shareholders, who allege that Rupert Murdoch is over-paying for his daughter's company...

by James Taylor
Last Updated: 19 Aug 2013
Elisabeth Murdoch is, admittedly, doing rather well out of News Corp's acquisition of Shine, her independent TV production company: as well as receiving a large chunk of the $675m price tag, she's also getting a seat on the News Corp board. But is this a fair reflection of the company's value? Not according to two of News Corp's smaller shareholders, who have launched a lawsuit accusing Rupert Murdoch of treating the company like a 'family candy store'. But there's an easy answer to this, surely...

The lawsuit has been filed by trustees of Amalgamated Bank of New York and the Central Laborers Pension Fund, both News Corp shareholders (and both newly off the Murdochs' Christmas card list). Their basic argument is that Rupert has persuaded the News Corp board to over-pay for Shine, just because he wants to do his daughter a favour. 'In short, Murdoch is causing News Corp to pay $675 million for nepotism,' says the writ. 'In addition to larding the executive ranks of the company with his offspring, Murdoch constantly engages in transactions designed to benefit family members.' It's also suggesting the board breached its fiduciary duty to shareholders by not blocking the bid.

All very inflammatory, headline-grabbing stuff. But does it have any merit? Not according to News Corp, as you'd expect - it has dismissed the claim, arguing that Shine is a 'very attractive business' that fits perfectly into News Corp's entertainment portfolio. And given some of the high-profile TV content Shine produces, including the likes of Spooks, Masterchef, and One Born every Minute, it's undoubtedly an attractive asset.

So the question really boils down to: is News Corp paying too much? Well, independent assessments of the deal thus far don't seem to think so (or at least, not massively). More to the point, the deal is still subject to approval by both boards and News Corp's audit committee, not to mention an independent fairness opinion. If it fails one of those tests, these recalcitrant shareholders may have a chance; if it doesn't, it's hard to see this challenge getting anywhere.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Upcoming Events

Latest on MT

'Don't be governed by risk' - Pitcher & Piano founder Crispin Tweddell's start-up cocktail

'Don't be governed by risk' - Pitcher & Piano founder Crispin Tweddell's start-up cocktail

The entrepreneur-turned-investor shares his recipe for success - know your customer and be ready to take a chance.

How Mike Ashley can fix Sports Direct's reputation

How Mike Ashley can fix Sports Direct's reputation

His company's name has been well and truly sullied, but Mike Ashley still has the chance to reform it, through transparency.

Get ready for the 'Lego' organization

Get ready for the 'Lego' organization

In a rapidly changing world, businesses will become amalgams of building blocks that come together for specific purposes.

Do you believe Elon Musk's vision of the future?

Do you believe Elon Musk's vision of the future?

The Tesla entrepreneur's 'Master Plan, Part Deux' could bring him up against Uber in the driverless ride-hailing market.

Corbyn wants small firms to report their gender pay gap too

Corbyn wants small firms to report their gender pay gap too

The Labour leader has launched his re-election campaign with plans to tackle discrimination.

Why social enterprises shouldn't consider profit a dirty word

Why social enterprises shouldn't consider profit a dirty word

Doing good and making a bundle aren't incompatible, writes Rhea Silva.