Calling time on the all-male board

Following Vince Cable's letter to the seven remaining FTSE 100 companies with all male boards, are quotas the right measure or should we be tackling the problem of discrimination earlier in a woman's career?

by Louise Taft
Last Updated: 19 Aug 2013

It is undoubtedly encouraging that our Business Secretary feels strongly about the status of women in the country’s most powerful companies. Few would denounce his letter last month as a pointless exercise. Sex discrimination was outlawed almost 40 years ago and yet a failure to promote women to senior positions remains a problem.

However, it is vital that the underlying issues of women in the workplace are addressed and not glossed over with trophy appointments in the boardroom. We have had the positive action provisions in the Equality Act 2010 (although these powers have been largely ignored). We also have the proposals for 40% ‘objective’ quota of female non-executive directors on the table from the European Commission. 

There is a danger however that women promoted by way of positive action will be seen as ‘token appointments’ or that ‘ghost’ non-executive directors are appointed to comply with the law but do not have a real impact.The real issue here is the one highlighted by former UK Minister for Women, Maria Miller; ensuring there is a pipeline of women progressing through the corporate structures and therefore being in a position to advance to board level on their own merits is undoubtedly the key. 

Women who are held back from progressing up the career ladder are so largely as a result of competing demands of work and family life – this has historically been a major problem, but shows no signs of disappearing. Pregnancy and maternity discrimination, which is still widespread, will continue to hold women back. Around 30,000 women lose their jobs due to maternity discrimination each year, according to Maternity Action, and many more are held back after taking maternity leave or working flexibly around childcare needs. 

More needs to be done to support women in the workplace at this vital stage of life if a real difference is to be made higher up the chain. Women need more information on their rights and should be confident in standing up to discrimination over their choice to have a family. Whilst legal measures put in place do encourage organisations to more actively consider women for senior roles, a career path unhampered by their wish to have a baby is vital. 

Until this vital subject is addressed, female progression to the highest levels of management will continue to be a struggle, and countless letters from Vince Cable will do little to help true female representation in the boardroom.

 

Louise Taft is senior employment solicitor at city law firm Prolegal.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Upcoming Events

Latest on MT

Meet the entrepreneur who keeps skyscrapers in shape

Meet the entrepreneur who keeps skyscrapers in shape

Niel Bethell's building maintenance business High Access has just raised £3.3m.

What are the ingredients of the perfect C-suite?

What are the ingredients of the perfect C-suite?

Harmonious dissonance in the boardroom can be a good thing, says Dean Stamoulis.

The business of golf has landed in the rough

The business of golf has landed in the rough

EDITOR'S BLOG: Adidas and Nike are getting out after conditions turned sub-par.

5 point guide to safeguarding your business

5 point guide to safeguarding your business

SPONSORED: Beef up your data security with these top tips.

Cheat sheet: restore your company's good name

Cheat sheet: restore your company's good name

The much maligned Sports Direct is opening its doors to the public. How else can you regain your reputation?

Uber drivers and cabbies are both set for the scrapheap

Uber drivers and cabbies are both set for the scrapheap

One day the fierce rivalry on London's roads will be consigned to history by self-driving cabs.