Editor's blog: Go easy on the kids
from
MT Editor
Matthew Gwyther
Search Blue Boomerang
Strategy & Operations
- FCUK offloads Farhi as part of restructure
- Brown sucked into BA strike row after Adonis shows no love for Unite
- Liberty freely admits bidders are circling
- Booming Waitrose powers John Lewis to bumper profits
- Fancy a pint before work? Wetherspoons to open at 7am
- Passenger numbers up - not the best time for a strike
Blogs
LATEST ENTRY
- Secret Diary of an Entrepreneur: Interview trial and error
- Editor's blog: Go easy on the kids
- Lady Geek: The Top 5 Gadgets To Buy for Mother's Day
MOST DISCUSSED
Toyota counting the cost of 8m safety recalls
Maintaining cars is an expensive business. Just ask Toyota: this problem with the accelerator pedal on several of its models is apparently going to cost it $2bn. However, if this new problem with the brakes on its hybrid Prius turns out to be a bigger issue than Toyota’s admitting, the total bill is likely to be a lot higher – and that’s not to mention the long-term impact this disastrous episode will have on its brand and reputation. Although on the plus side, at least it might do those knackered US carmakers a favour...
Toyota actually came out with some positive financial news for the market today: having previously predicted that it would make an annual loss of ¥200bn, it’s now expecting to make a profit of about ¥80bn (£550m) – apparently a better-than-expected last quarter has allowed it to hike its sales forecast from 7.03m to 7.18m cars. After a year in which its share price has plummeted by a fifth, destroying about $30bn of shareholder value, that’s a step in the right direction.
However, this nugget of good cheer was rather overshadowed by its admission of just how big a financial hit it is taking from this fiasco. The Japan-based carmaker has now had to recall 8m vehicles – including 180,000 in the UK – because of a problem with defective accelerator pedals. Apparently the part that fixes it is currently winging its way to Britain, but with lawyers warning that Toyota drivers shouldn’t use their cars because they might be liable for any accident, it continues to have a damaging effect on the brand. In fact, Toyota said today that the cost of fixing all these cars, plus the inevitable dip in sales that will follow, is going to cost them about $2bn.
But the financial damage will be much worse if this problem with the latest version of the Prius, its trendy hybrid model that has already sold 1.6m vehicles worldwide, turns out to be widespread. Toyota admitted today there was a software problem with the brakes; apparently it’s now been fixed, but presumably further recalls might be needed. Then you’ve got the potential lawsuits, not to mention the possibility of people steering well clear of their models in the future. After all, there’s no shortage of choice - so why take risks? And if Toyota has to slash prices to keep sales up, margins will be hammered.
Incidentally, we noticed that one of the highest-profile voices warning about the dangers of driving Toyotas yesterday was US transport secretary Ray LaHood – though he did later back-track, suggesting it was a ‘mis-statement’ (a Bush-ism if ever there was one). Still, we’re sure the fact that the ailing US carmakers stand to benefit from Toyota’s woes didn’t affect his opinion either way.
In today's bulletin:
Bank stops printing money - for now
1,000 job cuts in the pipeline at Shell as profits slide
Toyota counting the cost of 8m safety recalls
Sun CEO resigns in (Japanese) style - on Twitter
Good customer service not enough to rescue banks
You must log in to comment on articles.




All Comments
Jeff Allen 04-Feb-10, 14:14
Just to clarify one thing, Toyota also manufacture car in the US and have created US jobs in the supply chain, dealerships etc over 181,000 in all. Anyway arent we supposed to have open economies \(Kraft purchasing Cadbury) or is MT taking a different stance this week?
James Taylor (Web Ed) 04-Feb-10, 15:07
Jeff - wasn't really taking any stance to be honest, at least with regard to the openness of economies!
Though I guess if pushed we'd probably argue that it's better for politicians to stay out of this sort of thing, particularly if they have a vested interest in a competitor (which they do, having bailed out Detroit - not saying Toyota's woes have no relevance to the US but they're not directly backed by the US government in quite the same way). And judging by the rapidity of LaHood's back-tracking, he may have reached the same conclusion.