BP really is going through the mill. Just a couple of weeks after it was handed a record fine over the Gulf of Mexico oil spill back in 2010, today the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has said suspended it from new contracts with the government. Unfortunately for BP, the US is still one of its principal geographic areas, and this move from the EPA will effectively sideline the firm from both the supply and exploration markets in US oil.
Just a couple of weeks ago, the company admitted criminal liability for the Gulf of Mexico disaster, which spilled millions of gallons of crude oil into the ocean. It agreed to pay a $4.5bn fine in criminal and regulatory charges, on top of the tens of billions it has already paid into a compensation and clean-up fund. Nonetheless, in a statement, the EPA said: 'EPA is taking this action due to BP's lack of business integrity as demonstrated by [its] conduct with regard to the Deepwater Horizon blowout, explosion, oil spill, and response, as reflected by the filing of a criminal information'.
It goes without saying that all US corporations are well known for behaving with exemplary business integrity at all times, of course.
Luckily for BP, it has been in the process of re-balancing its business to reduce exposure to the US market, so the damage is perhaps not as bad as it could have been. But the situation is still not good: the US represented $1.7bn of its $3bn downstream quarterly profits in its latest results, and of its upstream profits (from oil drilling and production) the US represented a sixth. Needless to say, shares in the company dropped 1% on the news - which, by the way, nobody was expecting - so investors are evidently not ready to shrug this off.
So when will the BP execs be allowed to carry on oiling it up in US territory? Well, in the vein of a parent chastising a toddler, the EPA said: '[When there's] sufficient evidence that it meets federal business standard.' Exactly what BP has to do to demonstrate this is anybody's guess.