Goldman Sachs, the 'great vampire squid'

from
MT Editor
Matthew Gwyther

 

Management Today Jobs

Head of Media Relations
Up to £59,303, Central London
Trustees
Unpaid
Chief Executive Officer
c. £40,000 pro rata, Central London
 
 
 

Features

  • Britain's Most Admired Companies 2008
 
 
 

Current Poll


  • Are you more worried about short-term deflation or longer-term inflation?




Search Blue Boomerang

 

 
Blueboomerang
 
 

News

 
 
 

Personal act

 
Date: 06-Jun-07   Academy of Management Review
 
This author's 1984 'upper echelons' theory asserted that executives act on the basis of their personalised interpretation of strategic situations, which stems from their experiences, values and personalities.

To understand why companies act in the ways they do, it is better to examine the top team as a collective as they usually make decisions together, except in those cases where executives act as individual 'barons'.

Then you would have to examine the personalities and attitudes of the barons with the most influence. Whether a particular CEO has more influence than another will depend on a number of factors, such as the extent to which their company is at the mercy of the external environment.

Executives filter and distort information in a three-step process: the field of vision (where they look); selective perception (what they see and hear); and interpretation (the meaning they attach to the information). Future research should examine whether this is true and why executives experience certain changes at particular times.

Upper echelons theory: an update,

Donald C Hambrick,

Academy of Management Review, Vol 32 No 2, April 2007

 
 
 

Comments

There are currently no comments.

To post comments please log in here