What's the point of CSR?

Businesses are more concerned about the impact on their brand than actually doing good.

by Jack Torrance
Last Updated: 09 Feb 2016

For many businesses, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become a series of meaningless buzzwords, like ‘caring’, ‘sharing’, and ‘authentic,’ lamented Matthew Taylor in a recent column for MT. New research suggests he might have a point.

Just 28% of leaders of large British companies believe that CSR is a ‘central driver of modern business success,’ and 38% said while it is important to consider, it is not vital, according to research published by investment firm Kohli Ventures today. That could all depend on one’s definition of success, of course. Short-term profits? Long-term growth? Creating ‘happiness’?

The research, conducted by YouGov, also asked those leaders who do participate in CSR schemes what motivated them to do so. Although 58% said it was their ‘duty’, by far the most popular answer (on 75%) was that it ‘helps our branding’, and 30% said they measured the value of their CSR programme based on its ability to raise their company's profile. And people say business is cynical...

It certainly seems as though CSR has been on the back burner since the financial crash, which forced businesses to jettison what they view as non-essential spending. But the likes of Unilever, whose boss Paul Polman has an obsessive commitment to sustainability, are still fighting the good fight. What’s more, a generation of younger, supposedly more socially conscious workers is thought to be forcing big companies to think again.

There are some signs of this in the research. Though a majority of workers said a company’s CSR policy was unimportant when choosing where to work, only a foolish employer would ignore the 24% who said it was. Most businesses (57%) said the youth of today are more interested in CSR than previous generations.

Perhaps the biggest problem with CSR is the way it is treated as an add-on, rather than a way of doing business. Asked what programmes their company participated in, many cited things like time donation (48%) and skill donation (30%) – where employees are allowed time off to work on a charitable project to help those in need.

But CSR needs to be about more than volunteering or giving cash. A company whose staff spend a couple of days a year in a soup kitchen but the rest of their time fleecing customers and destroying the environment can hardly be called responsible.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Upcoming Events

Latest on MT

Should CEOs resign after a personal scandal?

Should CEOs resign after a personal scandal?

Antonio Horta-Osorio says he won't quit Lloyds after The Sun labels him a 'love rat'.

Was Virgin Trains right to call out Jeremy Corbyn?

Was Virgin Trains right to call out Jeremy Corbyn?

Attacking politicians is seldom a good idea, no matter how far from power they seem.

Why working mothers are screwed

Why working mothers are screwed

Working mums are paying a 'motherhood penalty', missing out on pay rises and promotions.

How to stop your business getting too big for you

How to stop your business getting too big for you

Doubling your team overnight might sound like a start-up's dream, but it can very quickly turn into a nightmare if you're not careful, says digital marketing entrepreneur Guy Levine.

Aldi and Lidl's growth story is far from over

Aldi and Lidl's growth story is far from over

UPDATE: The discounters continue to expand market share, but there's a glimmer of hope for Tesco. Asda not so much.

Why your business should consider ditching bonuses

Why your business should consider ditching bonuses

Star fund manager Neil Woodford is getting rid of bonuses, claiming they can cause the wrong kind of behaviour.