95% mortgage scheme fails to (New)Buy much favour

A Government scheme to help first-time buyers with 95% mortgages is already mired in controversy.

by Emma Haslett
Last Updated: 12 Mar 2012
‘NewBuy’, the Government’s new scheme to encourage first-time homebuyers, launches today – and it’s already causing plenty of controversy. The scheme will allow 100,000 first-time buyers to buy a new-build property up to the value of £500,000 with a deposit of just 5%. So far, so reasonable. But critics have been quick to point out that it may not have the desired effect: to start with, giving people a mortgage with a high loan-to-value ratio has got us in a spot of bother before…

The scheme (not to be confused with FirstBuy, another, marginally different Government scheme) is the pet project of housing minister Grant Schapps and communities and local government secretary Eric Pickles, and was first mooted back in the autumn. The idea is that housebuilders will pay 3.5% of the sale price of the property into an account at whichever bank supplies the mortgage. The Government will then guarantee another 5.5% of the price, which will only be called upon if there’s a major crash in house prices.  

For the Government, it’s win-win: not only will the scheme help youngsters get on the first rung of the ladder, but it’ll also give a boost to housebuilders, who complain that while they’ve got the land and ‘queues’ of keen potential buyers, many of their customers are struggling to save up the £20,000 plus needed as a deposit for a mortgage. A side-effect should also be to rebalance the rental market, which is becoming increasingly expensive as new buyers are priced out of the market.

Or that’s the idea. Critics aren’t terribly impressed with the plans: the usual arguments about offering high loan-to-value mortgages aside, they argue that this will help builders more than it’ll help buyers. That’s mainly because builders set the prices on new properties – so new-builds often lose a portion of their value once buyers move in and the market has its own say on the value of the property, which isn’t good for buyers.

There are were also – understandably – worries over Government meddling with (or simply ignoring) market forces. In fact, Government schemes like this rarely work out. Also, as Telegraph columnist Ian Cowie pointed out, the scheme may actually reverse its desired effect: if it’s as popular as the PM wants it to be, it will drive up demand, thus driving up prices, thus making it even harder to buy a house. ‘Consider the words of an earlier Conservative Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher… who simply said: "You can’t buck the market",’ pointed out Cowie. Indeed.

So could this be a case of something looking too good to be true? ‘ "Caveat Emptor" would be my advice to anyone thinking of buying a new build today using the NewBuy scheme,’ reflected property expert Henry Pryor on his blog today. And when even the industry’s proponents are advising caution, that’s got to be cause for concern.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Is it favouritism to protect an employee no one likes?

The Dominic Cummings affair shows the dangers of double standards, but it’s also true that...

Masterclass: Communicating in a crisis

In this video, Moneypenny CEO Joanna Swash and Hill+Knowlton Strategies UK CEO Simon Whitehead discuss...

Remote working forever? No thanks

EKM's CEO Antony Chesworth has had no problems working from home, but he has no...

5 rules for work-at-home productivity

And how to focus when focusing feels impossible.

Scandal management lessons from Dominic Cummings

The PR industry offers its take on the PM’s svengali.

Why emails cause conflict

And what you can do about it.