Is (a lack of) office politics hindering women's progress?

A report suggests women aren't advancing at work because they're unwilling to be political animals.

Last Updated: 31 Aug 2010

Why aren’t there more women in leadership roles within UK plc? The latest theory comes from an HR consultancy called the Academy for Political Intelligence: it suggests that women just aren’t as political as their male counterparts, so they’re losing out as a result. The good news is that this isn’t because they’re incapable, it’s because they choose not to be. So there’s a solution to the problem: convince women that not all office politics is bad…

According to the API, its latest research has discovered ‘a genuine difference in the way in which men and women view and use political behaviours’. Or perhaps more precisely, it shows that women think there’s a difference: 75% of those surveyed (most of whom were women) think the political behaviour of men and women is different, while about two-thirds of women believe men are more politically active. But if you’re wondering what this means, exactly, the report has little in the way of answers: not many of those concerned could actually come up with any concrete examples, other than a few vague generalities about late-night alcohol-based networking and the like.

The API reckons this is a question of inclination, not ability. Its research apparently suggests that women don’t consider themselves to be less politically adept than men. However, it claims the vast majority of people – men and women – take a dim view of office politics in principle, and as a result many women choose not to get involved. On the other hand, 79% of women also think that they need to be more political to get ahead. You can’t have it both ways, and men appear to be better at reconciling these two views (or at least, ignoring such scruples).

The key, the consultancy claims, is to give women a more positive view of organisational politics. People have no problem it with it as a way to achieve collective goals (as opposed to personal ones). So if women can be taught to think about it in these terms, they might be less reluctant to play the game.

So does the API have a point? Well, in general, we’re a bit sceptical about reports that generalise about gender differences in the workplace, as this one does. And it might seem rather predictable that the Academy for Political Intelligence reckons that being more political is the solution to all our woes. But there is some evidence that – very broadly speaking – men are more adept at gaming the system, whereas women are more inclined to play by the rules (that’s thought to be one reason why girls out-perform boys at school, but not thereafter). So maybe it is onto something...

In today's bulletin:

Virgin launches retail banking push with Church House deal
Bernie Ecclestone wants to take the driving seat at Saab
Banks take control of ailing Foxtons
Is (a lack of) office politics hindering women's progress?
LAST CHANCE TO WIN - The MT Prize Quiz 2009

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Is it favouritism to protect an employee no one likes?

The Dominic Cummings affair shows the dangers of double standards, but it’s also true that...

Masterclass: Communicating in a crisis

In this video, Moneypenny CEO Joanna Swash and Hill+Knowlton Strategies UK CEO Simon Whitehead discuss...

Remote working forever? No thanks

EKM's CEO Antony Chesworth has had no problems working from home, but he has no...

5 rules for work-at-home productivity

And how to focus when focusing feels impossible.

Scandal management lessons from Dominic Cummings

The PR industry offers its take on the PM’s svengali.

Why emails cause conflict

And what you can do about it.