Credit: The Tax Haven/Flickr

Banks pay $2bn in forex settlement

Now that the regulators have had their fill, disgruntled investors are going after the world's biggest banks through the civil courts.

by Adam Gale
Last Updated: 23 Sep 2015

The financial sector may have turned over a new ethical leaf in the last few years, but its atonement for past sins is proving lengthy – and painful. Nine of the world’s biggest banks settled a court case yesterday with US investors who lost out as a result of foreign exchange rigging, in what could be the start of a new wave of painful litigation.

Barclays, RBS and HSBC joined Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Bank of America, UBS and BNP Paribas to pay $2bn (£1.3bn) in a civil case in New York. The litigation is ongoing against another 12 banks, including London-based (for now) Standard Chartered.

Regulators in Britain, America and Switzerland have already taken a whopping $10bn in fines and settlements over forex rigging since November. Admitting guilt may have closed these big criminal and regulatory investigations, but it’s also paved the way for civil cases, with pension and hedge funds leading the calls for compensation.

Bank of New York Mellon and Bank of America paid out $180m each in law suits earlier this year, while JP Morgan and UBS coughed up $100m and $135m respectively. The 12 remaining defendants in the case partly settled yesterday face what’s likely to be another big hit, and that’s just one lawsuit, in one country.

‘There is no doubt that anyone who traded FX in or through the London or Asian markets – which transact trillions of dollars of business every day – will have suffered significant loss,’ said Anthony Maton, London Managing Partner of Hausfeld, the law firm conducting the case in New York. ‘Compensation for these losses will require concerted action in London.’

Is that the sound of thousands of City bankers gulping simultaneously? Of course, US law lends itself better to compensation claims through class actions, which we don’t have here in a meaningful sense, but it does open up the possibility of UK and European civil cases, which could drag on for years. The worst may be over for the banks, but they’re clearly not out of the woods yet.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

A leadership thought: Treat your colleagues like customers

One minute briefing: Create a platform where others can see their success, says AVEVA CEO...

The ignominious death of Gordon Gekko

Profit at all costs is a defunct philosophy, and purpose a corporate superpower, argues this...

Gender bias is kept alive by those who think it is dead

Research: Greater representation of women does not automatically lead to equal treatment.

What I learned leading a Syrian bank through a civil war

Louai Al Roumani was CFO of Syria's largest private retail bank when the conflict broke...

Martin Sorrell: “There’s something about the unfairness of it that drives me”

EXCLUSIVE: The agency juggernaut on bouncing back, what he would do with WPP and why...

The 10 values that will matter most after COVID-19

According to a survey of Management Today readers.