Barclays caves as Varley puts job on the line

Barclays has offered UK investors a slice of its rights issue - and put its entire board up for re-election.

Last Updated: 31 Aug 2010

Barclays has finally given in to the growing hostility to its proposed £7bn Middle Eastern capital-raising – it’s going to let UK investors buy (a relatively paltry) £500m of reserve capital instruments, a type of security that in this case will pay out a juicy 14% coupon. The bank’s head honchos, led by CEO John Varley, have also tried to head off their critics by agreeing to forego all their annual bonuses, and, remarkably, by offering themselves up for re-election en masse at next April’s AGM. A rather melodramatic ‘back us or sack us’, in other words.

Barclays’ big shareholders – who include L&G and Aviva – have been up in arms about the terms offered to the Middle Eastern funds providing the bank’s fresh capital. Under the new arrangement, the Qatari and Abu Dhabi investors will now give up £250m each of these instruments, for other (mostly British) institutional investors to buy. However, they’re hanging on tight to their lucrative warrants, which will eventually give them a combined stake of about 30% in Barclays. They might want to soothe relations with the rest of the shareholder base, but they’re not soft...

Many critics argued that it would have made a lot more sense for Barclays to take the British taxpayer’s money, rather than going cap-in-hand to the Persian Gulf and selling shares on the cheap. And the more unkind suggested that the Barclays board only did this because they didn’t want the Treasury capping their big fat bonuses – hence today’s announcement that its executive directors won’t be taking a bonus this year. And this is actually a pretty big concession: poor old Bob Diamond, the head of Barclays Capital, will have to make do with a measly £250,000 this year, rather than the eye-popping £21m he took home last year (wonder if he'll be shopping at Aldi this Christmas?).

Nonetheless, this will still be a controversial and probably unpopular deal for Barclays to get away, which is why the board has made this bold ‘back us or sack us’ gesture. In practice, it’s probably a bluff, since it’s highly unlikely that shareholders would get rid of the entire board all at once (the FSA would have a fit, apart from anything else). But it does put them in line for a substantial public dressing-down, at the very least.

However, the outcome largely depends on what happens between now and then. If Barclays flourishes as an independent, while the Government-backed banks are stymied by Treasury interference and over-regulation, Varley and co will look like geniuses. But if Barclays gains no particular advantage from independence, the April AGM could be rather hairy for them...

In today's bulletin:
Biggest drop in inflation for 16 years
Barclays caves as Varley puts job on the line
Easyjet row escalates as Stelios refuses to sign off accounts
Is the UK suffering a brain drain?
Competition: Win two FREE business class flights with bmi

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Which values matter most in a crisis?

Have your say on how coronavirus is changing your culture.

C-Suite parents share working at home tips

For many people, the home office is now also a home school.

How to manage remote teams (without becoming a Zoom pest)

Briefing: Former Waitrose boss Mark Price says managers will need to think about how they’re...

Could coronavirus lead to gender equality?

Opinion: Enforced home-working and home-schooling could change the lives of working women, and the business...

Mike Ashley: Does it matter if the public hates you right now?

The Sports Direct founder’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn criticism, but in the...