Barclays suffers £47m third-quarter loss thanks to PPI

The bank has reported a pre-tax loss of £47m because of the cost of PPI compensation charges, and has warned that it may face another fine from US authorities.

by Michael Northcott
Last Updated: 19 Aug 2013

The PPI mis-selling issue that has been plaguing many UK banks is now hitting Barclays rather hard. The bank today announced a £47m pre-tax loss for the third-quarter of this year, compared with a £2.4bn profit for the same period the previous year, and even £1.2bn profit in the quarter just before. The hit includes a massive £1.1bn charge that the bank has had to pay against its own debt, under a controversial new accounting regulation. 

So, does this mean the bank is in bad health? Not in the long term, no. If the effects of the charge against debt and the PPI compensation are stripped out, the bank would have made a clean £1.7bn profit, an increase on the previous quarter and probably just about enough to keep investors happy. And whilst the bank does have to pay these monstrous amounts of money (it has now got £2bn set aside for PPI claims), that storm will eventually blow over, leaving the bank in a better position.

Just as an aside, it is worth noting that the effect of PPI compensation payouts on the economy is significant. In March this year, the Office for Budget Responsibility revised its forecast for income growth over the following two years upwards by 0.5%, saying that this was largely because of the effect of PPI compensation. But, then, it stands to reason. If you inject billions of pounds into the real economy in a short space of time, it tends to offer a little boost. 

Anyway, Barclays has warned investors that there is potentially another hurdle: it may be facing another fine from the US over electricity trading. Barclays disclosed today that it is being investigated by the US Department of Justice and the SEC to find out whether it has breached any corruption laws. It’s fair to say that US authorities have been rather trigger-happy with fining non-American banks in recent months, and it is thought that the new fine could be revealed by the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at some point today. Suffice it to say, details about what exactly the bank is supposed to have done wrong are pretty scarce.

Still, whatever the whys and wherefores, investors are miffed with the situation: shares in Barclays were down 4.4% in early trading in London, making the bank the second-biggest FTSE 100 faller. The firm’s new chief executive, Anthony Jenkins, said: ‘The last three months have been difficult ones for Barclays’. And bleeding billions out to customers and regulators in a single quarter is a tough one for the shareholders to swallow, too… 

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

What Lego robots can teach us about motivating teams

People crave meaningful work, yet managers can so easily make it all seem futile.

What went wrong at Debenhams?

There are lessons in the high street store's sorry story.

How to find the right mentor or executive coach

One minute briefing: McDonald’s UK CEO Paul Pomroy.

What you don't want to copy from Silicon Valley

Workplace Evolution podcast: Twitter's former EMEA chief Bruce Daisley on Saturday emails, biased recruitment and...

Research: How the most effective CEOs spend their time

Do you prefer the big, cross-functional meeting or the one-to-one catch-up?

6 rules for leading a remote team

Our C-suite panel share their distilled wisdom.