Biofuel investment

Companies interested in investing in the biofuel industry need to take into account three risk factors: the cost and availability of feedstock; the impact of government regulation in different countries; and the conversion technologies that might reduce the production costs in certain geographies.

by McKinsey Quarterly, No 2, 2007
Last Updated: 23 Jul 2013

The cost of feedstock has a big effect on profitability because currently it makes up 50-80% of biofuel production costs. A dollar increase in the price of a bushel of corn in the US can reduce a producer's operating margin by 20%.

In the US, the government's ambitious target to switch to alternative fuels has contributed to a rise in the price of corn, one of the feedstock sources used to produce biofuels. In 2005, the average price of a bushel of corn was $1.90, rising to $2.41 a year later. At the end of 2006, the price increased to $4 a bushel on the spot market.

The rise of demand for biofuel has convinced some governments that producers no longer deserve to be subsidised by the public purse. In Germany, the government has said it will eliminate subsidies gradually by 2012, replacing them with a guarantee that producers will have a certain level of sales.

This figure is based on the percentage of biofuel that is blended with conventional fuel (the mandated blend rate). The mandated blend rates will vary from place to place, creating another uncertainty in the market. US regulators, for example, could set a blend rate of 10% (the maximum suitable for current vehicles) to 85% (the maximum suitable for most flex-fuel vehicles, which are designed to run on ethanol).

German companies spend about $2.90 to produce a gallon of biofuel with a subsidy of $1.81 per gallon. Losing the subsidy will clearly reduce margins unless demand rises significantly in the short term, which is unlikely. Some producers, therefore, may experience a significant drop in their margins, perhaps as much as 80%.

While some investors may bet on biofuel producers in countries where there is a cheaper cost source of feedstock, the next generation of biofuel technology may change things yet again making it cheaper to produce the fuel in hitherto less attractive countries.

Lignocellulosic technology is designed to enable producers to use sugar extracted from cellulose in low-cost feedstock such as corn stover, sugarcane stalks, switch-grass and wood. If the technology becomes viable by 2010, as some believe, production costs in China, for example, would drop from $1.80 per gallon to $0.60.

Three main types of businesses are interested in this alternative energy: asset owners, which produce and market biofuels; producer and service providers, which tailor their technologies and processes to the needs of the biofuel industry; and market participants, such as gasoline blenders.

Betting on biofuels
William K Caesar
Jens Riese
Thomas Seitz
McKinsey Quarterly, No 2, 2007.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

When spying on your staff backfires

As Barclays' recently-scrapped tracking software shows, snooping on your colleagues is never a good idea....

A CEO’s guide to smart decision-making

You spend enough time doing it, but have you ever thought about how you do...

What Tinder can teach you about recruitment

How to make sure top talent swipes right on your business.

An Orwellian nightmare for mice: Pest control in the digital age

Case study: Rentokil’s smart mouse traps use real-time surveillance, transforming the company’s service offer.

Public failure can be the best thing that happens to you

But too often businesses stigmatise it.

Andrew Strauss: Leadership lessons from an international cricket captain

"It's more important to make the decision right than make the right decision."