BP looks to spread the blame for Gulf of Mexico blowout

On the anniversary of the spill, BP sues Transocean, the rig operator, and Cameron, which made the faulty blowout preventer.

by James Taylor
Last Updated: 19 Aug 2013
Yesterday was a year to the day since the Deepwater Horizon explosion that killed 11 people, and BP is still counting the cost - both financially and reputationally. But although it has never tried to disclaim responsibility, it has always argued that it shouldn't have to carry the can alone. Now it's finally trying to get the courts to back this argument: it has just launched lawsuits against Transocean, which operated the faulty rig, and Cameron International, which made the bit of kit that was supposed to prevent explosions like this. The hope is that this could mitigate a bill that may yet hit $60bn...

BP claims Transocean is guilty of negligence, on the grounds that 'every single safety system and device and well control procedure on the Deepwater Horizon failed'. Not surprisingly, Transocean slammed the suit as 'specious and unconscionable', a 'desperate bid' by BP to abrogate responsibility (which obviously it would never do). BP is also demanding that Cameron be forced to cough up 'all or part' of BP's costs, because its blowout preventer 'failed to work' and was 'flawed in design'. Both suits have been filed in New Orleans, and the timing is because yesterday marked the deadline for the parties involved to sue each other.

The stakes are pretty high here. BP has already set aside $41bn to cover the fall-out, including a $20bn compensation pot that it's handed over to the US authorities. But ratings agency Moody's said this week that the final figure could be closer to $60bn - it points out that BP hasn't really budgeted for the costs of paying any fines yet (apart from those under the Clean Water Act). Moody's reckons BP could actually afford this, if push came to shove (it's already selling $30bn of assets, and has a similar amount of cash in the bank, plus more assets that could be sold if needs be). But anything it can do to spread the burden would obviously be a huge bonus.

The question is, will BP be able to convince the US courts that Transocean and Cameron deserve some of the blame? BP remains massively unpopular in the US - but it might actually be helped by the official White House report, which seemed to spread the blame around all those involved. For what it's worth, Moody's reckons Cameron will get away largely unscathed, but Transocean will find it harder to dodge the bullet. Either way we can now expect an extended period of legal wrangling; BP may not know what the real damage is until the back end of next year. Good news for the lawyers, if nobody else.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

The ignominious death of Gordon Gekko

Profit at all costs is a defunct philosophy, and purpose a corporate superpower, argues this...

Gender bias is kept alive by those who think it is dead

Research: Greater representation of women does not automatically lead to equal treatment.

What I learned leading a Syrian bank through a civil war

Louai Al Roumani was CFO of Syria's largest private retail bank when the conflict broke...

Martin Sorrell: “There’s something about the unfairness of it that drives me”

EXCLUSIVE: The agency juggernaut on bouncing back, what he would do with WPP and why...

The 10 values that will matter most after COVID-19

According to a survey of Management Today readers.

Why efficiency is holding you back

There is a trade-off between performance and reliability, but it doesn’t have to be zero-sum....