Britain's Most Admired Companies 2012: Property

These players prove that top quality bricks and mortar - retail, office space or commercial - is still a safe haven for investors...

by MT Staff
Last Updated: 09 Oct 2013

It’s London all the way at the top of this sector, as the capital enjoys safe haven status with investors. First place goes to upmarket office specialist Derwent London. During the first nine months of the year, central London office investment totalled £10.4bn, 15% higher than the 2011 annual total. No wonder it received the highest score in its sector for financial soundness. Great Portland Estates, which owns a portfolio worth £2bn including a recently acquired chunk of Jermyn Street, climbs one place to second. Meanwhile, West End and Soho commercial property group Shaftesbury drops one place to third. Its CEO of 26 years, Jonathan Lane, stepped back to become chairman in February, replaced by former FD Brian Bickell.

 

- Go to the BMAC homepage


BMAC 2012 by sector: Property

Ranking Name Score
1. Derwent London
70.5
2. Great Portland Estates
69.3
3. Shaftsbury
66.3
4. Hammerson
63.9
5. Land Securities
62.9

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Want to encourage more female leaders? Openly highlight their achievements

A study shows that publicly praising women not only increases their willingness to lead, their...

Message to Davos: Don't blame lack of trust on 'society'

The reason people don't trust you is probably much closer to home, says public relations...

Dame Cilla Snowball: Life after being CEO

One year on from stepping back as boss of Britain's largest advertising agency, Dame Cilla...

How to change people's minds when they refuse to listen

Research into climate change deniers shows how behavioural science can break down intransigence.

"Paying women equally would cripple our economy"

The brutal fact: underpaid women sustain British business, says HR chief Helen Jamieson.

Why you're terrible at recruitment (and can AI help?)

The short version is you're full of biases and your hiring processes are badly designed....