Cameron prepared for talks over BAE-EADS merger

The ongoing sparring over the defence companies' merger has got David Cameron ready to jump in and try to rescue the deal.

by Michael Northcott
Last Updated: 19 Aug 2013

The prime minister is on standby to meet with Angela Merkel and François Hollande to rescue the £28bn merger of BAE Systems and EADS, after Germany suddenly demanded that the headquarters of the merged company be based in Munich. But Cameron will have to read the situation quickly: the deadline by which the Takeover Panel will need to ask for an extension is Wednesday of this week. Failure to ask for an extension will mean the deal either has to be agreed or abandoned altogether – not what any parties want.

The clamour surrounding the merger of the two defence giants has grown controversial in recent weeks, with some BAE shareholders complaining that they have been left out of the loop where the fine details are concerned. Many are concerned that BAE is wangling its half of the deal from a weak position, whilst EADS investors seem to think that the terms currently on the table are more favourably for BAE. And with £28bn in the offing, nobody is going to take anything lying down. 

Just as an example of investors’ candour, the largest institutional shareholder in BAE - Invesco with 13% - published a list of objections to the existing set of proposals on Monday. It reckons that the completed merger would damage the firm’s strength in the US, where it is in the rare position of being a foreign firm with access to highly secretive defence work. The firm is also concerned about the level of state interference in deal and expressed concerns about the strategic rationale of going through with a merger. As with many such enormous deals, it is not entirely clear what the benefit of having a mega-firm would actually be.

The sudden demands form Germany came as a massive blow to a deal which was evidently already embattled. Talks were trundling along nicely on Friday as negotiators tried to iron out existing (albeit stubborn) creases. But out of the blue came demands from Lars-Hendrik Roller, Merkel’s chief economic adviser, that the company’s main HQ be based in Munich. Previously the proposals were that a military HQ would be in Farnborough, and a civil aircraft HQ would be in France. The rest of the weekend was spent trying to work a new route around the fresh demands. So much for last week’s ‘no politics’ promise… 

So what are the consequences if the deal doesn’t go through? Well, having raised the spectre of a merger and the creation of a defence monolith, BAE would then face tough questions about its future. And yet the intervention of the PM in an attempt to push the deal through strikes many as pretty surreal. Do we really want hand over our largest remaining global defence contractor to a merger that would be effectively run by the German and French governments?

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

What Lego robots can teach us about motivating teams

People crave meaningful work, yet managers can so easily make it all seem futile.

What went wrong at Debenhams?

There are lessons in the high street store's sorry story.

How to find the right mentor or executive coach

One minute briefing: McDonald’s UK CEO Paul Pomroy.

What you don't want to copy from Silicon Valley

Workplace Evolution podcast: Twitter's former EMEA chief Bruce Daisley on Saturday emails, biased recruitment and...

Research: How the most effective CEOs spend their time

Do you prefer the big, cross-functional meeting or the one-to-one catch-up?

6 rules for leading a remote team

Our C-suite panel share their distilled wisdom.