Courage of their convictions: employers urged to hire ex-cons

Understandably, employers remain reluctant to hire ex-offenders (would you?). Should the Government step in?

by Emma Haslett
Last Updated: 08 Oct 2010
When Ken Clarke floated the idea at the Conservative Party conference this week of paying prisoners to work a 40-hour week while they’re behind bars, there was a bit of an outcry. But one group reckons there's a more pressing issue for the Government to address: how to persuade reluctant companies to hire ex-offenders when they come out of prison. On the face of it, it seems hard to criticise anyone for refusing to hire a convicted murderer, say. But if everyone refuses to hire them, the consequences could be grave - and expensive...

The new report, by ‘employment and skills specialist’ Working Links, makes a convincing economic case for giving additional support to ex-offenders. Apparently, reoffending rates are ‘greatly reduced’ when people get a job – and considering re-offenders apparently cost the UK some £11bn a year, that could mean a lot of money saved.

The trouble is, employers - understandably - aren’t too happy about taking on people with criminal records. Apparently, more than half would use a disclosed conviction to reject an applicant outright, while only 18% of businesses have actually employed someone who they knew had a conviction. But there's no reason to think they'll get their fingers burned if they do: of those who have employed someone with a criminal record, only 7% say they’ve had negative experiences, while 60% say their ex-offenders have performed ‘as well’ as someone without a criminal record.

Of course, employers' willingness to hire someone with a record tends to fluctuate by conviction, as you'd expect: the majority tend to ignore driving and alcohol-related offences, for example, while 85% report that they’d rather not employ someone who has been convicted of murder (who knew?).

Working Links wants the Government to step in and find ways to help ex-offenders find jobs, including creating a new ‘Offender Discrimination Act’, and/ or offering employers financial incentives to take on ex-criminals.

We can see their point - arguably everyone deserves a second chance once they've served their time. But it's a complicated one: businesses are bound to see hiring a convicted thief or fraudster (say) as a risk - and you don't really want to be taking too many of those in the current climate...

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Sarah Willingham: I will never start another business again

The entrepreneur and investor on top leadership skills, pivotal career moments and Dragons' Den.

A new etiquette for video meetings

Virtual calls are not the same as in-person conversations, so we need to change the...

There's opportunity in this recession

A Schumpeterian view of closing businesses.

Is it okay to spy on my staff if I think they're slacking ...

Everything you wanted to know about employee surveillance but were afraid to ask.

The psychology of remote working

In depth: The lockdown has proven that we can make working from home work, but...

A simple cure for impostor syndrome

Opinion: It's time to stop hero-worshipping and start figuring out what greatness looks like to...