The credit crunch: just so 80BC...

An Oxford historian says the credit crunch isn't so novel: the same thing happened in Republican Rome...

Last Updated: 31 Aug 2010

Philip Kay, a classics fellow at Wolfson College, Oxford University, suggested today that the world’s first credit crunch took place in Rome in the early 80s BC, while Mithridates of Pontus was making a nuisance of himself in the East. Apparently the orator Cicero gave a speech in 66BC reminding listeners of 88BC, when the losses incurred fighting the king in Asia led to a sudden contraction of credit in Rome. We wonder if the Romans got as sick of hearing about the crunch as we have?

Kay says that Mithridates’ incursions came after a period of huge economic expansion for Rome – as she spread her influence, particularly in the East, there was an unprecedented supply of gold bullion flowing back into the public coffers, and an explosion in the practice of money-lending in and around the forum (in other words, cheap credit and an expanding money supply). There was then a big shock to the system: Mithridates’ invasion of Asia, which cost Rome a fortune. As money drained out of the system, lenders began calling in loans and hoarding their money. Sounding familiar yet? 

Cicero (who was trying to persuade his countryman to fight off Mithridates’ later assault) even gave an early warning about the dangers of globalised finance. ‘Believe me when I tell you - what you see for yourselves - that this system of monies, which operates at Rome in the Forum, is bound up in, and is linked with, those Asian monies; the loss of one inevitably undermines the other and causes its collapse,’ he told his audience. Substitute ‘US sub-prime’ for 'the Asian monies' and ‘the UK banking system’ for ‘the system of monies at Rome’, says Kay, and the parallels are spooky.

Kay, who’s part of something called the Oxford Roman Economy Project (which as you’d expect, is a research project about the Roman economy) used to work in the City, so you’d be wrong to dismiss this as the whacky ramblings of a publicity-seeking glass tower-dwelling academic nutcase. Unfortunately, his research hasn’t been able to uncover the most important bit of information: how the Romans got themselves out of it, ‘There's very little information about what happened over the next 20 years I'm afraid,’ Kay told the Guardian. ‘We just don't know’.

The good news is they clearly did resolve the situation – but given that Rome was subsequently racked by decades of bloody civil war, it wasn’t the most peaceful of resolutions. Let’s hope Cameron and Brown’s enmity doesn’t go that far as and when lending conditions ease.

In today's bulletin:

RBS shows the way with repossession concession
Ryanair makes second pass at Aer Lingus takeover
Theo Paphitis linked with Woolworths rescue bid
Leighton's high-powered chums talk On Leadership
The credit crunch: just so 80BC...

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Could coronavirus lead to gender equality?

Opinion: Enforced home-working and home-schooling could change the lives of working women, and the business...

Mike Ashley: Does it matter if the public hates you right now?

The Sports Direct founder’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn criticism, but in the...

4 films to keep you sane during the coronavirus lockdown

Cirrus CEO Simon Hayward shares some choices to put things in perspective.

Pandemic ends public love affair with Richard Branson et al

Opinion: The larger-than-life corporate mavericks who rose to prominence in the 80s and 90s suddenly...

The Squiggly Career: How to be a chief strengths spotter

When leading remotely, it's more important than ever to make sure your people spend their...

"Blind CVs don't improve your access to talent"

Opinion: If you want to hire socially mobile go-getters, you need to know the context...