Darling renews attack on City - as banker slams his own

The Chancellor is going after bankers again - and even a senior JP Morgan boss seems to concur...

by
Last Updated: 31 Aug 2010

Alistair Darling’s addressing the Labour Party conference today, and as usual, the entire print media seems to know exactly what he’s going to say before he even stands up. Once again, voter-friendly banker-bashing will be top of the agenda – apparently we can expect more denunciations of ‘business as usual’ and ‘rewards for failure’, along with calls for deferred bonuses, claw-backs, and so on. As you’ll quickly note, there’s nothing particularly new here; the Government has said all this a million times already. But the Chancellor’s also hoping the weight of public opinion will shame the banks into paying smaller bonuses even before the rules have been changed...

Darling will apparently tell the assembled hordes that in the coming weeks, the Government will introduce legislation ‘to end the reckless culture that puts short-term profits over long-term success’. This will place new curbs on bonuses, as well as allowing the FSA to increase the capital requirements for particularly risky banks. However, none of the laws are going to make it onto the statute book before the banks get round to paying their year-end bonuses. So Darling (along with his new best mate, French counterpart Christine Lagarde) is trying to get them to comply voluntarily instead. This might sound optimistic, but the theory is that none of them will want the negative publicity big payouts will attract.

He may well have a point. Apparently Bill Winters, the co-CEO of JP Morgan's investment banking unit, told a conference last week that the financial collapse was the fault of 'greedy bankers, investors and borrowers' - i.e. his own City colleagues and clients. You might argue that people in glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones, but Withers (along with many senior bankers) has clearly realised which way the wind is blowing.

Of course, the Government’s hand-wringing on this issue might be a bit more credible had it not happily encouraged the status quo for the first ten years of its current tenure. Even Lord Mandelson admitted on Radio 4 that he did not ‘entirely blame people’ for thinking that Labour had ‘celebrated’ City bonuses while Gordon Brown was Chancellor.

But there’s another interesting consequence of all this, as the BBC’s Robert Peston points out today. Currently Lloyds and RBS find themselves at a competitive disadvantage because the terms of their state aid limit their bonus payouts. However, if the Government succeeds in limiting bonuses across the board, there’ll be less of an incentive for the best performers at these two banks to go and fill their boots elsewhere. So maybe this is all just a subtle form of protectionism to protect the taxpayer’s investment...


In today's bulletin:

Darling renews attack on City - as banker slams his own
Orange flexes its muscles with juicy iPhone coup
Not a single UK businesswomen in FT's Global Top 20
Regretful managers shy away from redundancies
MT Expert's Top Ten Tips: Achieving your full potential, with Usain Bolt

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

The psychology of remote working

In depth: The lockdown has proven that we can make working from home work, but...

A simple cure for impostor syndrome

Opinion: It's time to stop hero-worshipping and start figuring out what greatness looks like to...

I was hired to fix Uber’s toxic culture - and I did. Here’s ...

Harvard’s Frances Frei reveals how you know when your values have gone rotten, and what...

Social responsibility may no longer be a choice

Editorial: Having securitised businesses’ loans and paid their wage bills, it’s not inconceivable the government...

What went wrong at Wirecard

And how to stop it happening to you.

Leadership lessons from Jürgen Klopp

The Liverpool manager exemplifies ‘the long win’, based not on results but on clarity of...