Dyson sues Bosch over 'German spy' incident

The British engineering firm is suing Bosch after saying it has discovered that an employee was feeding company secrets to its German rival.

by Michael Northcott
Last Updated: 10 Sep 2013

It sounds like a geeky James Bond moment for the design and engineering world. But James Dyson’s company is alleging it has discovered that one of its employees in the Malmesbury inventing department was in fact a mole who was feeding sensitive intellectual property information back to Bosch. Dyson says that Bosch paid the spy through a strange ‘unincorporated business’ designed specifically for the purpose. Court proceedings have begun in earnest after Dyson asked for leaked information to be returned, and Bosch allegedly said ‘no’. 

Proceedings were filed against the German manufacturer in the High Court in London today, and Dyson is accusing Bosch’s vice president for engineering of being the spy’s direct contact back in Germany. In a statement, Dyson said: ‘Bosch Vice President, Dr Hirschburger, was aware of the engineer’s employment at Dyson. Dyson has confronted Bosch with evidence of wrongdoing but it has refused to return the technology. Nor has it promised not to use the technology for its benefit, forcing Dyson to take legal action.’

So what sort of technology were they developing? Mark Taylor, Dyson’s research and development director made clear what had been stolen: ‘Bosch’s Vice President for engineering employed a Dyson engineer and benefitted from our confidential know-how and expertise. We have spent over fifteen years and £100m developing high-speed brushless motors, which power our vacuum cleaners and Airblade hand dryers. We are demanding the immediate return of our intellectual property.’ So a couple of very miffed-sounding statements from the top brass at Dyson.

The firm’s Malmesbury engineering centre is a sort of Willy Wonka-esque, high-security location, so it’s particularly upsetting when some the firm’s recipes come under threat like this. Not to mention that Sir James Dyson, the firm’s founder, owns 100% of the stock, meaning that any ground lost in the race to produce the next big thing leaves him out of pocket. 

Dyson has a long history of vigorously defending attempts to infringe its IP. He definitely won’t be brushing this one under the carpet.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Why collaborations fail

Collaboration needn’t be a dirty word.

How redundancies affect culture

There are ways of preventing 'survivor syndrome' derailing your recovery.

What they don't tell you about inclusive leadership

Briefing: Frances Frei was hired to fix Uber’s ‘bro culture’. Here’s her lesson for where...

Should you downsize the office?

Many businesses are preparing for a 'hybrid' workplace.

How to make your team more accountable

‘Do as I do’ works a lot better than ‘do as I say’.

Black talent isn’t hard to find: It’s just you

If you want to attract the widest range of applicants, you need to think about...