HMRC chasing replay in Rangers tax match

HMRC is hoping to appeal against a tribunal that ruled in favour of Rangers' use of tax schemes. So far it's Rangers 2-1 HMRC.

by Dave Waller
Last Updated: 31 Jan 2013

The showdown began when it emerged that Rangers had used Employee Benefit Trusts to make £47.65m in payments to players and staff in the form of tax-free loans, from 2001 to 2010. HMRC scored first by challenging the payments, arguing that they were illegal. Rangers then equalized by disputing the bill, while a First Tier Tax Tribunal came off the bench in January and stuck a boot out to clinch what seemed to be the winner for Rangers, by ruling the scheme didn't breach tax law.

As they were loans not earnings, it said, they weren't liable for tax. Which of course left HMRC feeling sick as a parrot.

The Employee Benefit Trust is a classic tool of modern remuneration, and deftly highlights the grey area at the heart of today's bitter moral war against tax shenanigans. As the tribunal ruled, their use doesn't qualify as tax evasion, so they're not illegal. But it definitely constitutes clever tax avoidance - a tax dodge. The difference? While not illegal, it's hardly sporting, and definitely isn't challenging for the top spot in the premier league of 'things that make the working populace happy during a recession'.

The HMRC's legion of fans can at least take solace from the fact that Rangers are hardly running around looking like champs, despite their tribunal victory. The club has in fact endured an ignominious slide downwards. The old Rangers was under the control of Sir David Murray when it began using the EBTs. Murray sold the club for £1 to Scottish businessman Craig Whyte in 2011, while the tax liability was in dispute.

One month after the FTT's conclusion, the old Rangers, under the control of Whyte, was forced into administration by HMRC over non-payment of tax totalling about £14m, and the tax authority subsequently rejected proposals for a creditors agreement that would have allowed the old club to continue. These days Rangers is a new club, under the control of a consortium led by Charles Green, languishing in the Scottish Third Division.

And it's this that illustrates so much about the modern game: many clubs carry on chasing the glory with what seems scarcely any more regard for financial management than the average player has for grammar, monogamy or speed limits. And when it all comes crashing down, it's the fans, the ones who've kept the whole thing alive, that wind up suffering.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Why your turnaround is failing

Be careful where you look for advice.

Crash course: How to find hidden talent

The best person for the role might be closer than you think.

What they don't tell you about flexible working

The realities of ditching the nine to five don't always live up to the hype....

The business case for compassion: Nando's, Cisco and Innocent Drinks

Consciously, systematically humane cultures reap enormous benefits, argues academic Amy Bradley.

“I have great respect for the capital markets, but I don’t want their ...

Exclusive: PA Consulting CEO Alan Middleton on acquisition bids, growth strategy and life after private...

Dame Inga Beale: “I was told I didn’t deserve to be alive”

The former CEO of Lloyd's of London reveals the leadership lessons that shaped her career...