Transport for London said it had awarded the five-year contract to IBM after a 12-month tender process, ahead of present incumbent Capita and Thales Alliance. Apparently IBM’s bid was ‘the most economically advantageous’, which presumably means it charged less and was prepared to give a bigger chunk of profits to TfL (who will then re-invest them in London transport, of course).
It’s not such good news for outsourcing giant Capita, of course, which has been running the scheme since 2003 and had been widely expected to retain the contract. The estimated £60m hit to revenues is relatively small peanuts for a company with a market value of more than £4bn, but losing out on such a high-profile deal is never good for the reputation – particularly when most people have no idea what it is actually does. Its share price immediately fell almost 10%, wiping more than £400m off its value (although it did rebound later in the day).
When the contract starts in September 2009, IBM’s main role will be to supply the fancy technology to make the scheme work, while the dirty job of actually enforcing it will be delegated to its partner NCP (the car park operator).
But it’s unlikely to be an easy gig. The congestion charge has a habit of attracting controversy, whether TfL is expanding or shrinking its remit. Even the recent plan to exempt low-emission vehicles – which doesn’t exactly sound controversial – has been criticised by the Centre for Economics and Business Research as ‘a costly and risky white elephant’.
Still, IBM will have one big advantage over Capita – it can blame any teething problems on the previous incumbent. And if that doesn’t work, there’s always Ken Livingstone.