Credit: Imperial Tobacco

Imperial 'quits' its Tobacco

What's in a name? The cigarette maker tries to distance itself from cigarettes by renaming itself Imperial Brands.

by Adam Gale
Last Updated: 16 Dec 2015

Tobacco is a dirty word, for a lot of people at least. It’s not hard to see why, given the whole cancer connection, compounded by years of high taxes and negative marketing from health (and wallet) conscious governments. But for a tobacco company itself to turn its nose up at the word is perhaps more surprising.

Pending shareholder approval, 114 year-old FTSE 100 firm Imperial Tobacco will become Imperial Brands next year. Like Philip Morris in the US (now the far cleaner-sounding ‘Altria’), the firm apparently wants to distance itself from its products’ negative associations. Of course, ‘Imperial’ isn’t exactly PC either. Perhaps it could lose that too, and just start calling itself ‘Brands’?

Imperial’s decision – which it stresses will only really affect its Bristol HQ, as it’s ‘not a global rebranding’ – could have more to do with future diversification than PR. It already sells e-cigarettes and owns a logistics company (the imaginatively named Logista), which extends beyond its tobacco delivery core and contributed about 5% of the firm’s £3bn adjusted operating profit this year.

But there’s little else to suggest diversification is on the cards. Imperial spent $7bn (£4.7bn) entering the US tobacco market with a serious of brand purchases earlier this year. It’s got a clear strategy to focus on its ‘growth’ and specialist tobacco brands, particularly in emerging markets, and it appears to be working.

Operating profits were up 6.8% on a constant currency basis in the year to September 30, before the American purchases are taken into account, as volumes of Imperial’s growth brands grow. The other brands (‘portfolio’, which sounds better than ‘non-growth’) may be shrinking fairly rapidly, but the future of global tobacco actually looks quite good from where Imperial’s sitting.

In the future, as bans on advertising and the imposition of plain packaging spread to the developing world (presuming the big tobacco firms don’t beat it in the courts, as they are trying to do here), it may be that these firms need to diversify out of tobacco and into less controversial products – guns or hoverboards perhaps.

For the time being though, firms like Imperial are likely to continue to sell what they’ve always sold – regardless of what they choose to call themselves. 

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

“You literally have to rewrite your job description”

One minute briefing: In hard times, your network becomes more important than ever, says Prezi...

5 bad habits to avoid when leading remotely

In a crisis, it can be hard to recognise when you've taken your eye off...

A top-level guide to scenario planning

COVID creates unprecedented uncertainty, but there are tried and tested ways of preparing for an...

Is it favouritism to protect an employee no one likes?

The Dominic Cummings affair shows the dangers of double standards, but it’s also true that...

Masterclass: Communicating in a crisis

In this video, Moneypenny CEO Joanna Swash and Hill+Knowlton Strategies UK CEO Simon Whitehead discuss...

Remote working forever? No thanks

EKM's CEO Antony Chesworth has had no problems working from home, but he has no...