Lord Heseltine: An industrial strategy is 'urgent and unavoidable'

The former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister and chairman of Haymarket Group has set out his thoughts on why Britain must have an industrial strategy and what it should embrace.

by Michael Heseltine
Last Updated: 07 Dec 2017
Also in:
Down to business

When I was responsible for the publication of the government’s Competitiveness White Paper in the early 1990s, a respected financial journalist asked me to list the three punchlines I would like him to use. I refused because that completely missed the point.

An industrial strategy is not about legislative change, a new subsidy or a headline-grabbing initiative.

It is about changing attitudes, involving people, raising standards.

It is about spreading the excellence so conspicuous in much of our economy into places where performance is very different.

It is at least as much about persuading companies that don’t export as it is about persuading those that do to ship more.

It is about breaking the ever too present assumption that concentrating decision making in Whitehall can ever be so effective as trusting and sharing power with our citizens who are the heartbeat in our economic centres across the United Kingdom.

It is about lauding the quality of our great universities, outstanding comprehensive and grammar schools while adopting a policy of zero tolerance to schools that are failing a generation of young people.

An industrial strategy recognises that as employers, employees, purchasers, consumers, savers and spenders, politicians and councillors, officials and volunteers, we are all in this together with a part to play and a future to win.

The implications of Britain’s departure from Europe have one certain consequence: we have an urgent and unavoidable need to analyse and understand our competitive strengths and how we can exploit them in the realities of the world marketplace.

The debate about the desirability of an industrial strategy is as controversial as the Brexit decision itself. It shouldn’t be. The government’s forthright commitment to an industrial strategy is long overdue and particularly relevant now.

As someone once said, we need to intervene to help Britain’s companies win before lunch, before tea, before dinner and then get up and intervene before breakfast all over again. We had better get up early because our competitors will have been up before dawn.

INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY – A RESPONSE TO THE GOVERNMENT’S GREEN PAPER is available to buy here.

Tags:

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Is there a "good" way to demote an employee?

Another week, another Cabinet reshuffle. But while demotions aren’t pleasant, they don’t have to be...

Hybrid working: Should you set in-office days?

The pros and cons of setting in-office days versus giving your employees free rein.

How to banish Sunday night dread

Here’s why you might be getting Sunday night work dread and how to fix it....

3 moonshot innovations that might just work

From hybrid species to vacuum tube transportation, here are 3 outlandish ideas that could be...

The 7 horror stereotypes of new directors - and how to avoid becoming ...

How new board directors can avoid becoming one of 7 terrible clichés, by the managing...

5 things leaders can learn from Emma Raducanu's triumph

This weekend, 18-year-old Raducanu made history by winning the US Open. What can business leaders...