Is M&S to blame for its own decline?

Marks and Spencer has failed to hold onto its FTSE 100 place, but was that an impossible task?

by Adam Gale & Stephen Jones
Image credit: GianniM/Wikipedia
Image credit: GianniM/Wikipedia

Brexit wasn’t the only Great British exit to dominate the headlines this week, as the news broke that high street stalwart Marks & Spencer will shortly lose its place in the FTSE 100. 

While Boris Johnson may yet pull a filibustering trick from his voluminous sleeve before the week is out, M&S CEO Steve Rowe will rue his inability to prorogue the LSE’s quarterly reshuffle of Britain’s biggest largest listed companies, with M&S shares falling 1.5 per cent to 187p (valuing the company at £3.6bn) by the end of Tuesday. 

In any case, it would merely be delaying the inevitable. In reality, the retailer’s fall has been a long-time coming. A decade ago profits topped £1bn, but following a consistent decline in retail sales, caused in part by an inability to adapt to increasingly challenging high street conditions, latest profits were just 10 per cent of that. 

Sign in to continue

Sign in

Trouble signing in?

Reset password: Click here


Call: 020 8267 8121



  • Up to 4 free articles a month
  • Free email bulletins

Register Now

Become a subscriber

From £66 a quarter

  • Full access to
  • Exclusive event discounts
  • Management Today's print magazine
  • Plus lots more, including our State of the Industry Report.

Choose a Package