Motor mouth: VW UP

VW's Up is basic yet characterful and, best of all, the fuel gauge needle never seems to move.

by Sathnam Sanghera
Last Updated: 09 Oct 2013

The first car I ever reviewed, more than a decade ago, was a large saloon with a 5.5-litre engine. I took it to Frankfurt to test on the autobahn, where, at 140 mph, I found myself being overtaken by a newer version of the same model with a seven-litre engine.

It's hard to imagine any of this happening in 2012. Driving to Germany is no longer my idea of fun. Hitting 140 mph would terrify me. And I cannot think of the last time a mainstream manufacturer released a car with a seven-litre engine - the horsepower race having been overtaken by the race for efficiency. Ford recently replaced the 1.6-litre engine in the Focus with a three-cylinder, one-litre number which is just as powerful and yet 15% to 20% more economical. Fiat claims you can get 70 mpg out of the two-cylinder engine in its 500 Twinair.

And VW has launched this, the Up, a small three-door car with a three-cylinder, 1.0-litre engine producing 59 or 95 bhp.

In many ways, testing the Up proved as memorable as my first test drive. It's attractive from the front and back, and yet looks ridiculous from the sides. It is titchy and yet airy inside. It has the verve of a moped, offers the driving position of a van and my test car, in red, looked like a small London bus.

More than any car I've driven, the Up makes you question your assumptions about what you want from a car. The mirrors are operated from stalks. There's no reach adjustment for the steering wheel. The boot offers about as much storage as a printer tray. The biggest button on the dashboard is the one to turn off the passenger airbag. The engine is so anaemic you can't hear it when it starts. And yet it all feels curiously sufficient. Do you need electric mirrors when you only really need to adjust them once? Must you have a sophisticated computer when a TomTom-style sat-nav/control screen works so well? And do you need so much power when you get such efficiency in return?

Maybe I'm getting old, but I got as much of a thrill out of seeing the fuel gauge needle remaining stationary as I did from seeing the speedometer needle hit 140 mph in Germany that time. An inspiring little motor. 4 Out Of 5 ****




1.0-litre, 3 cylinders, petrol Power 59 bhp @ 5,500 rpm
Torque: 70 lbs/ft @ 3,000 rpm
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Fuel consumption: 62.8 mpg (combined cycle)
CO2 emissions: 105 g/km
0-62 mph: 14.4 seconds
Top speed: 99 mph


Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

The ignominious death of Gordon Gekko

Profit at all costs is a defunct philosophy, and purpose a corporate superpower, argues this...

Gender bias is kept alive by those who think it is dead

Research: Greater representation of women does not automatically lead to equal treatment.

What I learned leading a Syrian bank through a civil war

Louai Al Roumani was CFO of Syria's largest private retail bank when the conflict broke...

Martin Sorrell: “There’s something about the unfairness of it that drives me”

EXCLUSIVE: The agency juggernaut on bouncing back, what he would do with WPP and why...

The 10 values that will matter most after COVID-19

According to a survey of Management Today readers.

Why efficiency is holding you back

There is a trade-off between performance and reliability, but it doesn’t have to be zero-sum....