MT's Little Ray of Sunshine: A canis canem edit world

Local council have banned Latin on the grounds that it's confusing and elitist. But cui bono, exactly?

by James Taylor
Last Updated: 19 Aug 2013

Generally speaking, we’re big fans of the campaign for plain English here at MT – there’s far too much jargon in the professional world for our liking, and local government tends to be more guilty than most. However, we can’t help feeling that things have gone too far when councils start banning the use of Latin pro bono publico. Perhaps aware that ipsa scientia potestas est, several UK local authorities have banned the use of Latin expressions – e.g. vice versa, quid pro quo etc. – because it’s elitist and discriminatory. A case of damnant quod non intellegunt, perhaps?

Bournemouth Council, for instance, has come up with a list of 18 phrases that staff are not to use in verbal or written correspondence. ‘We advise against using certain words, particularly when staff are writing to those whose first language may not be English,’ a spokesman told the BBC. He insists it’s ‘a guide only, not a direction’ – but that sounds like a de facto rule to us, unless you want to be persona non grata within your own office. The town has always been a destination of choice for those seeking physical recuperation, but perhaps the burghers of Bournemouth have lost interest in the mens sana in one’s corpore sano?

The Plain English Campaign also supports the ban – it suggests that officials use Latin, inter alia, to make themselves feel important, and points out that it might stop people confusing e.g. with the word ‘egg’ (arguably such people ipso facto don’t deserve public support, but we’ll let that slide). They clearly feel that mutatis mutandis, the senatus populusque Britannicus will find a more enlightened modus vivendi.

Yet despite being caught in flagrante delicto, the councils concerned don’t seem to have had a change of heart. So whether you consider this ban the ne plus ultra of political correctness, or you think using Latin phrases is merely ars artis gratia, barring some kind of deus ex machina, it looks like alea iacta est. Your only consolation is that councils don't last forever and might not get re-elected; forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit, as Virgil might have said if he’d worked in Bournemouth Highways Department.

Personally we preferred the status quo ante bellum. We can't tell you how important we feel now, for example.

 


P.S. There'll be a prize for the first reader who has the skills - and let's be honest, the patience - to send us translations of all the Latin phrases harmed in the making of this article. Answers to editorial@managementtoday.com...


In today's bulletin:
Barack Obama sweeps to power - now for the hard bit
Next takes another beating
FirstGroup sees wheels come off in US
MT's Little Ray of Sunshine: A canis canem edit world
Why extra training can save you money

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Mike Ashley: Does it matter if the public hates you right now?

The Sports Direct founder’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn criticism, but in the...

4 films to keep you sane during the coronavirus lockdown

Cirrus CEO Simon Hayward shares some choices to put things in perspective.

Pandemic ends public love affair with Richard Branson et al

Opinion: The larger-than-life corporate mavericks who rose to prominence in the 80s and 90s suddenly...

The Squiggly Career: How to be a chief strengths spotter

When leading remotely, it's more important than ever to make sure your people spend their...

"Blind CVs don't improve your access to talent"

Opinion: If you want to hire socially mobile go-getters, you need to know the context...

The highs and lows of being a super-achiever

Pay it Forward podcast: techUK boss Jacqueline de Rojas and Google UK's marketing strategy and...