New tax year, new tax hikes?

The IFS says the Government may need to raise an extra £1,200 per family to plug the budget deficit.

Last Updated: 31 Aug 2010

The Institute of Fiscal Studies reckons that if the Government wants to get public borrowing under control, it will need to get its hands on an extra £39bn per year by 2016 – and that’s on top of its current money-saving plans. If it relies on tax hikes for this, the average family in the UK would end up paying an extra £1,250 in tax every year. A painful prospect – but with the cost of bailing out the banking sector continuing to spiral, the IFS thinks that the Government needs to go an awful lot further than it has done so far.

The IFS estimates that the total bill for the banking bail-out will eventually tot up to around £130bn. And unfortunately, the Treasury hasn’t yet factored this into its sums. In last year’s Pre-Budget Report, Chancellor Alistair Darling identified £38bn of cuts, but the IFS reckons he’ll need to find at least twice that – which is likely to mean all of us paying higher taxes. Although since even Darling now admits the recession’s going to be a lot worse than the Government suggested (who'd have thought it), it’s going to have a tough time scraping that kind of sum together.

As the new tax year begins today, higher-rate tax payers are already facing up to paying NI at 11% for a larger chunk of their income. But if the IFS is to be believed, this could be the least of high earners’ problems: since any Government would have a hard time hammering those on low incomes to pay for bankers’ excesses, they’re the ones likely to bear the brunt if taxes do go up.

We’ll have to wait for the Budget on 22 April to see what exactly Darling plans to do about all this. The lateness of the date does rather suggest that there won’t be any radical changes to the tax regime (not surprisingly, with a General Election looming on the horizon) – so if the Government is going to convince the world that it’s serious about balancing the books, we’re likely to see some fairly savage public spending cuts. You won’t find much opposition to the idea that our bloated public sector needs some serious trimming, but it remains to be seen whether any Government can actually make this happen in practice...

In today's bulletin:

HSBC: more popular than the Government
New tax year, new tax hikes?
Bosses eject from easyJet and Aer Lingus
Twitter 'set for Google windfall'
Blackthorn backlash brewing

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

The ignominious death of Gordon Gekko

Profit at all costs is a defunct philosophy, and purpose a corporate superpower, argues this...

Gender bias is kept alive by those who think it is dead

Research: Greater representation of women does not automatically lead to equal treatment.

What I learned leading a Syrian bank through a civil war

Louai Al Roumani was CFO of Syria's largest private retail bank when the conflict broke...

Martin Sorrell: “There’s something about the unfairness of it that drives me”

EXCLUSIVE: The agency juggernaut on bouncing back, what he would do with WPP and why...

The 10 values that will matter most after COVID-19

According to a survey of Management Today readers.

Why efficiency is holding you back

There is a trade-off between performance and reliability, but it doesn’t have to be zero-sum....