News Corp directors approve plans to break up company

Plans to split Rupert Murdoch's media empire in two have been approved by directors at News Corporation.

by Michael Northcott
Last Updated: 19 Aug 2013

The phone-hacking scandal and its aftermath have obviously set minds a-pondering at the top table of News Corporation, as today it emerged that company directors have approved the split of the publishing and entertainment arms into separate entities. In its current form, the business is worth around $50bn, but after a process that will take around a year, two separately traded businesses will emerge.

Shares in News Corp have been climbing steadily as the rumours of the break up have circulated, including an 8.3% rise on Tuesday when the company released a statement admitting that it was considering the break up. This morning they were up a further 2.5% even before the news of the board approval emerged, putting them at their highest price since the company bough Dow Jones back in 2007. Exciting stuff for anyone ballsy enough to sell: 10% growth in a week is a mammoth return…

But why break the company up when it is financially in great shape? Well, it’s all about the bad press. The publishing arm of the business, which includes the Wall Street Journal, The Times and the Sun, has been heavily scrutinised over the last 18 months thanks to the phone-hacking scandal, which resulted in the closure of the News of the World. Murdoch is facing pressure from shareholders after News Corp’s bid to buy the share it didn’t already own in British Sky Broadcasting fell through – and many put this failure down to the reputational damage done by the firm’s British newspaper scandal.

It’s going to be a complex operation splitting the business however. Deciding how to apportion future fines and legal bills over phone hacking between the two sides of the company will be tricky. The publishing arm, for example, contributes 25% of revenue to the business ($8.8bn), but only 10% of profit. If the companies do go ahead to be separately listed, it will be interesting to see which one shareholders flock to. But there is definitely a sense that Murdoch is ‘ring-fencing’ the publishing arm to protect the entertainment side from legal repercussions from phone hacking.

Finally – and no surprises here – Murdoch is expected to be chairman of both companies, meaning the Murdoch family will not have lost their vice grip on this global media monolith. So a new chapter, but no real change to the Murdoch family vault. And Rupe will want to have another crack at the bit of BSkyB he doesn't already own before he hangs up his hat…

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

A leadership thought: Treat your colleagues like customers

One minute briefing: Create a platform where others can see their success, says AVEVA CEO...

The ignominious death of Gordon Gekko

Profit at all costs is a defunct philosophy, and purpose a corporate superpower, argues this...

Gender bias is kept alive by those who think it is dead

Research: Greater representation of women does not automatically lead to equal treatment.

What I learned leading a Syrian bank through a civil war

Louai Al Roumani was CFO of Syria's largest private retail bank when the conflict broke...

Martin Sorrell: “There’s something about the unfairness of it that drives me”

EXCLUSIVE: The agency juggernaut on bouncing back, what he would do with WPP and why...

The 10 values that will matter most after COVID-19

According to a survey of Management Today readers.