Organic Production Systems - Manufacturing Lessons from the Biological Cell

In looking for efficient models of manufacturing, one need look no further than nature itself, which over the course of four billion years of evolution has developed a lean and adaptive manufacturing system: biological cells. This system, say Professors Lieven Demeester, Christoph Loch and Luk Van Wassenhove, all from INSEAD, may provide a roadmap for transforming industrial manufacturing from its traditional large, centralized plants to smaller, more adaptive systems that can reduce waste and better meet the needs of local markets.

by Lieven Demeester, Christoph Loch, Luk Van Wassenhove
Last Updated: 23 Jul 2013

What can cell behavior teach us about manufacturing processes? According to Lieven Demeester, Assistant Professor of Operations Management, Christoph Loch, Professor of Operations Management, and Luk Van Wassenhove, the Henry Ford Chaired Professor of Manufacturing, all from INSEAD, the cell is not such a far stretch as a manufacturing model. It mirrors a number of production control principles already in use in modern factories. In cells, for example, production occurs only when triggered by a downstream shortage of end products, thus avoiding the accumulation of inventories. Additionally, cells use sophisticated quality control techniques such as 100% inspection, quality assurance, and fool proofing (i.e., using molecules with geometric shapes such that only the correct reactions are possible).

Beyond these similarities, the cell has advanced to create systems that are radically different, and significantly more efficient, than those found in today’s manufacturing models. Cells constantly experiment in order to be prepared for change. The cell has multiple “backup” plans, and continuously experiments with new plans through mutation and genetic recombination. In addition, building materials circulate in closed recycling loops. No material is ever completely wasted, what is one organism’s waste gets reprocessed by another organism. Finally, cells use a small set of common building blocks to create “products.”

These features are the point of interest for the authors, who have developed a new vision for manufacturing, which they call an “organic production system.”

Such a system would differ from traditional mass-production systems on a number of levels. Instead of large, centralized plants, an organic system would have numerous small-scale production sites closer to the customer, allowing the sites to be more responsive to the local market. Organic systems would use fewer and more basic production materials that could combine to serve many purposes and allow for a higher level of material reuse.

Some manufacturers are already moving in this direction. Norway’s Hydro Norsk is building a geographically distributed network of aluminum re-melting plants, close to customer sites and with local collection of scrap aluminum. Similarly, Regale, a California company that produces molded fiber packaging made entirely from post-consumer waste paper, is following a “one packaging plant per township” vision, allowing the company to quickly respond to packaging needs of local manufacturers. These companies also illustrate the move toward fewer, more basic “modular” materials.

Looking ahead, it is clear that some industrial processes are more likely to transform to organic production systems than others, say the authors. Companies that can most benefit from this shift include those where: <UL>

<LI>Customers need to replace the product rather frequently, either because it wears out or because it becomes dated.

<LI>Transportation costs are high compared to the production cost of the product and where small-scale production methods are feasible.

<LI>The product comes in a variety of sizes and forms and fit is an important value component for customers.

<LI>Multiple, face-to-face interactions with the customer during the life of the product are required or beneficial.

<LI>Regions can be identified in which there is both a sufficient demand for this product and the presence of active local recycling loops for some of the materials used in it.</UL>

The authors state that even the largest and most traditional of manufacturing facilities can be proactive about this transformation by introducing it into selected parts of their supply chains.


Lieven Demeester, Christoph Loch, Luk Van Wassenhove recommends

Click here to read the full article on INSEAD Knowledge

Read more

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

There's opportunity in this recession

A Schumpeterian view of closing businesses.

Is it okay to spy on my staff if I think they're slacking ...

Everything you wanted to know about employee surveillance but were afraid to ask.

The psychology of remote working

In depth: The lockdown has proven that we can make working from home work, but...

A simple cure for impostor syndrome

Opinion: It's time to stop hero-worshipping and start figuring out what greatness looks like to...

I was hired to fix Uber’s toxic culture - and I did. Here’s ...

Harvard’s Frances Frei reveals how you know when your values have gone rotten, and what...

Social responsibility may no longer be a choice

Editorial: Having securitised businesses’ loans and paid their wage bills, it’s not inconceivable the government...