Osborne proposes user-generated government

The Chancellor wants our views on where the spending axe should fall. Isn't that his job?

by
Last Updated: 31 Aug 2010

On a day when a respected credit rating agency (if that’s not a contradiction in terms) warned that Britain needs to act faster to reduce its deficit, sending the pound tumbling against the dollar yet again, the Government appears to be floating the idea of a new approach to fiscal policy: choose your own cuts.  Apparently the Treasury will seek the public’s views on what functions the Government should perform, and which it shouldn’t – the theory being that this is not just about saving money, but offering people a ‘once-in-a-generation’ chance to change the way Government works. A noble aim – but we can’t see many turkeys voting for Christmas…

Chancellor George Osborne and Treasury Secretary Danny Alexander (in for the much-lamented David Laws) are due to outline the framework today for their autumn spending review, which could apparently slash some departmental budgets by a quarter. Among the ideas being floated is the creation of a ‘star chamber’ of civil service and ministerial bigwigs, before whom ministers will have to justify how much they’re spending, if they’re spending it in the most efficient way and whether the same service would be better provided by the private or voluntary sectors.

It sounds like a sensible attempt to introduce some extra scrutiny and avoid the Whitehall ministerial stitch-ups of the past. And the idea of public consultation also makes sense, to some extent. With Fitch warning today that the UK faces a ‘formidable challenge’ to reduce its deficit (and arguing for faster spending cuts – music to Tory ears), it’s increasingly clear that swingeing cuts and tax hikes are on the way. And the Government is obviously keen to create as broad a consensus as possible about where the axe should fall. ‘We’re all in this together’ is the Con/Lib mantra (well, that, and: ‘It’s all Labour’s fault', natch).

So you can see the point. And it’s all quite zeitgeist-y – it chimes nicely with fashionable ideas like co-creation and user-generated content. But the problem is it’s very unlikely people will come out in favour of cuts that will cause them pain. How many will be able to put the country’s interest ahead of their own self-interest? (And would it actually be rational of them to do so?) That’s the burden of Government: to make decisions that are in the best interest of the country, even if they’re opposed by large swathes of the country (as public sector cuts and tax hikes inevitably will be). So we suspect this public consultation is more an exercise in public relations...


In today's bulletin:

Sir Terry Leahy to retire after steering Tesco through the storm
Osborne proposes user-generated government
MT Leadership Visions: Eric Salama, CEO of Kantar Group
Ocado offers shares with your sun-blushed tomatoes
John Vincent: On Situational Leadership

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

A leadership thought: Treat your colleagues like customers

One minute briefing: Create a platform where others can see their success, says AVEVA CEO...

The ignominious death of Gordon Gekko

Profit at all costs is a defunct philosophy, and purpose a corporate superpower, argues this...

Gender bias is kept alive by those who think it is dead

Research: Greater representation of women does not automatically lead to equal treatment.

What I learned leading a Syrian bank through a civil war

Louai Al Roumani was CFO of Syria's largest private retail bank when the conflict broke...

Martin Sorrell: “There’s something about the unfairness of it that drives me”

EXCLUSIVE: The agency juggernaut on bouncing back, what he would do with WPP and why...

The 10 values that will matter most after COVID-19

According to a survey of Management Today readers.