Asset evaluation

Political selections

The selection interview frequently serves as a political arena for various power networks in the organisation whose interests may conflict. Instead of selecting the right person for the job, members of the interview panel try to advance the interests of the power networks to which they belong by lobbying for the candidates whose background and values concur most with those interests.

by Human Relations 58 No 12, December 2005
Last Updated: 23 Jul 2013

In a number of cases, certain candidates are preferred and are offered the job at the expense of other clearly superior candidates. In such cases, performance in the interview is presented as justification for the decision. However, these decisions are the result of a political exercise.

The interviews that lend themselves to manipulative power games are those that are purported to fill critical posts in the middle and upper echelons of organisations. First, such posts, apart from having a functional importance, are also politically important because they can influence resources, processes and outcomes, which can shift the balance of power in an organisation, an organisational function or a work unit.

Second, as people move up the organisation their work becomes more complex, hence the criteria for merit and performance become more blurred and ambiguous, and the greater the potential for involvement of politics in relevant decisions. Therefore, there is both motive and opportunity for the use of political tactics in selection interviews that aim at filling critical posts in organisations.

There is a widespread belief that erroneous decisions are the result of limitations of the selection method or in the abilities of the interviewers. But, while genuine error might account for a large proportion of inappropriate decisions, interview-based decisions that favour less competent candidates are in some cases the outcome of power games.

To deal with this situation more research is needed, as well as acknowledgement and better understanding of the political interview. This will aid in accounting for cases where clearly inferior applicants have entered vital organisational positions via the formal selection route at the expenses of considerably more qualified candidates

Source: When the inferior candidate is offered the job: the selection interview as a political and power game
Nikos Bozionelos
Human Relations 58 No 12, December 2005

Review by Roger Trapp

Human Relations 58 No 12, December 2005 recommends

Click here to read the full article

Read more

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

A leadership thought: Treat your colleagues like customers

One minute briefing: Create a platform where others can see their success, says AVEVA CEO...

The ignominious death of Gordon Gekko

Profit at all costs is a defunct philosophy, and purpose a corporate superpower, argues this...

Gender bias is kept alive by those who think it is dead

Research: Greater representation of women does not automatically lead to equal treatment.

What I learned leading a Syrian bank through a civil war

Louai Al Roumani was CFO of Syria's largest private retail bank when the conflict broke...

Martin Sorrell: “There’s something about the unfairness of it that drives me”

EXCLUSIVE: The agency juggernaut on bouncing back, what he would do with WPP and why...

The 10 values that will matter most after COVID-19

According to a survey of Management Today readers.