Poor people skills destroy merger values

Apparently European companies are losing billions by failing to plan the people side of big M&A deals.

Last Updated: 31 Aug 2010

That’s the conclusion of new research by HR consultancy Hewitt Associates, which surveyed 40 European companies involved in M&A deals in the last two years. Apparently 83% said they’d failed to meet their ‘key transaction goals’ (i.e. the ‘synergies’ they were expecting) – and in almost every instance, this came down to ‘human capital challenges’. In other words, because big companies aren’t thinking hard enough about the HR consequences of these big merger deals, the combined entity isn’t worth as much as it could be. At a time when so many other variables are out of their control, this seems short-sighted, to say the least.

All in all, the study considered European M&A deals worth nearly $300bn. Hewitt found that failing to plan for people issues that might arise from these tie-ups – like choosing suitable leaders, combining different cultures and losing key employees – makes it much more difficult to integrate the two businesses. This in turn affects the combined group’s valuation; possibly by as much as 12.8%, according to Hewitt's (suspiciously precise) estimate. So a lack of HR planning – an eminently avoidable mistake – may have destroyed about €27bn of value in the last two years alone, by our calculation. Not too clever, particularly in the circumstances.

What’s more, European companies appear to be much less concerned about the people implications of a deal than their international counterparts. According to this study, just 7% involved the HR department in target selection, compared to a global average of 36%; only one in four involved HR in drafting the employee section of the deal agreement, versus a global average of 43%; and less than half even bothered to involve HR in the integration planning, compared to the global average of 73%. So as a continent, we’re very much bottom of the class.

This isn’t exactly a new problem, of course. For years HR types have been complaining that CEOs spend too much time thinking about the strategic and financial benefits of a tie-up, and not enough time thinking about how it will actually play out on the shop floor. But things don’t seem to be improving – perhaps because the downturn has pushed such issues even further down the priority list. And with dealflow likely to pick up sharply as the economy recovers, it’s about time Europe raised its game.

In today's bulletin:

CBI tags Gordon Brown as an economic vandal
Unhappy Birthdays for Clinton Cards
P&G claim that Pringles 'not a crisp' takes VAT-man's cake
Poor people skills destroy merger values
Trader's boozy bet results in two-year FSA ban

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Should CEOs get political?

The protests that have erupted over George Floyd’s murder have prompted a corporate chorus of...

“You literally have to rewrite your job description”

One minute briefing: In hard times, your network becomes more important than ever, says Prezi...

5 bad habits to avoid when leading remotely

In a crisis, it can be hard to recognise when you've taken your eye off...

A top-level guide to scenario planning

COVID creates unprecedented uncertainty, but there are tried and tested ways of preparing for an...

Is it favouritism to protect an employee no one likes?

The Dominic Cummings affair shows the dangers of double standards, but it’s also true that...

Masterclass: Communicating in a crisis

In this video, Moneypenny CEO Joanna Swash and Hill+Knowlton Strategies UK CEO Simon Whitehead discuss...