SABMiller hits back at ActionAid tax attack

SABMiller has denied claims that it's siphoning profits offshore to avoid paying tax in Africa. Other multinationals may be taking notes.

by Dave Waller
Last Updated: 06 Nov 2012

ActionAid had accused the company, the world's second-biggest beer firm, of avoiding millions of pounds of tax in India and Africa by steering profits generated there through a string of subsidiaries based in offshore tax havens. SAB says the development charity makes a number of ‘flawed assumptions’ in its report, and insists that it does not engage in ‘aggressive tax planning’ in any part of its operations. Clearly the brewer isn’t the type to watch someone throw peanuts into its pint glass without hitting back.

In a report entitled ‘Calling Time: Why SABMiller should stop dodging taxes in Africa’, ActionAid claimed that SAB reduced its African corporation tax bill by as much as a fifth last year, depriving poorer countries of up to 20m in tax. Just the kind of public row you don’t want when you’re a London-listed firm with annual profits of nearly £2bn. Especially since tax-dodging is such a hot political topic at the moment.

For its part, SAB pointed out that it’s a major direct investor, employer and taxpayer in the developing world: in the year ending March 2010, it says its total global tax contribution was just under $7bn, about 77% of which went to developing countries. It reckons its economic contribution to South Africa constitutes around 3.1% of GDP – and separate INSEAD research suggests that it also contributed $92m in added value to the Ugandan economy.

SAB also pointed out that these offshore subsidiaries were fully taxed in the UK as controlled foreign companies, and that centralising operations saved money and prevented it from being taxed twice for the same thing. In other words, SAB’s argument was that there’s nothing shady going on here – it’s transparent in all its affairs, compliant with tax laws, and is making decisions for commercial reasons. And therein lies the flaw in ActionAid’s argument, which the charity itself acknowledges: such techniques are not only commonplace but entirely legal.

Hence why these practices are not exactly uncommon among global corporates. But the kind of attention SAB is receiving will make other multinationals twitchy. Chances are that in these times of austerity, any suggestion of tax-dodging will go down like a dodgy pint, and could seriously undermine a company’s reputation. Expect to see more stories like this in the coming months...

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Could coronavirus lead to gender equality?

Opinion: Enforced home-working and home-schooling could change the lives of working women, and the business...

Mike Ashley: Does it matter if the public hates you right now?

The Sports Direct founder’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn criticism, but in the...

4 films to keep you sane during the coronavirus lockdown

Cirrus CEO Simon Hayward shares some choices to put things in perspective.

Pandemic ends public love affair with Richard Branson et al

Opinion: The larger-than-life corporate mavericks who rose to prominence in the 80s and 90s suddenly...

The Squiggly Career: How to be a chief strengths spotter

When leading remotely, it's more important than ever to make sure your people spend their...

"Blind CVs don't improve your access to talent"

Opinion: If you want to hire socially mobile go-getters, you need to know the context...