It's supposed to be self-explanatory, representing the party's hope that 'this will be a year for change'. It could have said that. Instead, we get an ugly, truncated phrase that says nothing. 'Year' needs something in front of it: 'a' or 'the', or an exhortation such as 'Make this a ... '. As it is, it sounds blunt and aggressive. Then there's 'change'. As a political rallying cry, 'change' is feeble. It just says: 'Fed up with the other lot? Give us a try.' It promises something different, but not something better. It's also a shameless echo of the Obama campaign, but Obama's slogan was grammatical and made sense: 'Change we can believe in.' And in the US context, 'change' was a resonant and powerful word, recalling Sam Cooke's 'A change is gonna come', an anthem of the black civil rights movement. Swapping one Westminster party and career politician for another is nothing like that.
Like closed sales and ROI, company culture is a reliable predictor of successful business performance. And like any revenue driver, it should be analysed and developed.
LONG READ: Regulation alone isn't sufficient to control corporate excess, say academics Rob Goffee, Gareth Jones and Roger Steare.
UPDATE: Melrose ups the ante on GKN hostile takeover bid.
The Dexters CEO has seen his company grow despite a challenging market.
Be yourself? It's not quite so simple, says Professor Margarita Mayo.
Private equity boss Andy Grove reveals what investors look for in growing companies.