Students should bear the brunt of uni fees, says CBI

Higher tuition fees are 'inevitable' despite attempts to cap them, a report has found.

Last Updated: 12 Oct 2010

Undergraduates should be forced to foot the bill for their higher education studies, a report by the Confederation of British Industry has concluded. Students face a triple blow, under the proposals - higher tuition fees, more expensive interest rates and fewer grants.

The year-long review of higher education funding by business leaders and vice-chancellors also urged the Government to abandon its target of getting 50% of 18-30 year-olds into higher education. The public purse can’t take the strain, it says, so the onus to pay should be on the students themselves, much as it is in America. It also suggests that such a move would save money and discourage students from taking those courses which don’t offer good job prospects

The CBI has certainly done its maths. It reckons that the Government will save itself around £1.4bn by raising the interest on student loans to match commercial rates, and a further £1.25bn could be raised for universities by increasing tuition fees (currently capped at £3,100 a year) to £5,000. It also wants to clamp down on student grants for those from less well-off families.

This has all gone down about as well as you’d expect with the NUS - Wes Streeting, president of the student organisation, told the Guardian newspaper that the recommendations were ‘offensive’ and constituted a retrograde move that would render higher education institutions the preserve of the rich and privileged once more.

But just in case all you out there in UK plc were starting to feel left out, the proposals also call for an increased contribution to higher education from business, including offering golden hellos to those studying science and engineering.

Of course it’s true that money will have to be saved on public spending, in education as is just about very other area. So the report is certainly timely. And providing the human ‘raw material’ for the economy - literate, numerate and motivated potential employees – is certainly one function of the education system. But is it the be all and end all?

We’re not convinced. Education is first and foremost about developing character, personality and individual achievement, and it is counterproductive to try too hard to manufacture a workforce for its own sake. Fully-rounded individuals who can think for themselves make better employees than any number of cookie-cutter drones-in-the-making.  


In today's bulletin

Ball's still in the air at ITV

Students should bear the brunt of Uni fees, says CBI

Win a bottle of bubbly in our public sector cuts competition

Editor's blig: Vittorio Colao's big idea

MT Expert's Top Ten Tips: Managing pressure to optimise performance



Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

A leadership thought: Treat your colleagues like customers

One minute briefing: Create a platform where others can see their success, says AVEVA CEO...

The ignominious death of Gordon Gekko

Profit at all costs is a defunct philosophy, and purpose a corporate superpower, argues this...

Gender bias is kept alive by those who think it is dead

Research: Greater representation of women does not automatically lead to equal treatment.

What I learned leading a Syrian bank through a civil war

Louai Al Roumani was CFO of Syria's largest private retail bank when the conflict broke...

Martin Sorrell: “There’s something about the unfairness of it that drives me”

EXCLUSIVE: The agency juggernaut on bouncing back, what he would do with WPP and why...

The 10 values that will matter most after COVID-19

According to a survey of Management Today readers.