Tata in crisis as sacked chairman lashes out

Why did Cyrus get sacked? It's a Mistry.

by Jack Torrance
Last Updated: 01 Nov 2016

It seems the sudden departure of Cyrus Mistry, now the former chairman of Tata, was as big a surprise for him as it was for the rest of the world. In a fiercely-worded email he sent to the Indian conglomerate’s board, that has since been leaked, the London-educated exec suggested he was ditched ‘without so much as a word of explanation’ or any opportunity to defend himself – leaving him ‘shocked beyond words’.

But his criticism of the conglomerate, owner of Britain’s Jaguar Land Rover and Tetley Tea, among dozens of other businesses around the world, went far beyond its handling of his sacking. Despite saying he has no wish to ‘air a laundry list’, Mistry uses 2,000 words to absolutely savage the company he has been a board member of since 2006. He took aim at several of its divisions, including its ‘continuously haemorrhaging’ telecoms business, which faces regulatory fines, the large debts remaining on several of its foreign investments (including its European steel interests) and its airlines – an industry he seems to have been reluctant to have entered at all.

Mistry seemed especially incensed about the Nano (pictured), Tata’s attempt to build the world’s most affordable car. Its price was suppose to remain under 1 lakh rupees (roughly £1,200), Mistry says, but the cost of producing it has always been higher. ‘As there is no line of sight to profitability for the Nano, any turnaround strategy for the company requires to shut it down. Emotional reasons alone have kept us away from this crucial decision,’ he wrote.

Related: What's an ex-British diplomat doing heading Tata in Europe?

The Irish citizen (on his mother’s side) went on to suggest his attempts to deal with these problems had been hampered by the company’s complex and inconsistent governance structures, which left him as a ‘lame duck chairman’. Sixty per cent of the company, which will be chaired by Ratan Tata in the interim, is owned by several charitable trusts bequeathed by its founders (two of which are run by Ratan) and many of its divisions are listed, rather than wholly-owned subsidiaries.

The spat is extremely embarrassing for Tata, but it has dealt with the matter fairly well thus far. In a statement today it refuted the ‘unsubstantiated claims and malicious allegations’ and declined to ‘engage in a public spat’ – promising to respond to the specific claims in more detail later. ‘The Directors of the Tata Sons board had repeatedly raised queries and concerns on certain business issues, and Trustees of the Tata Trusts were increasingly getting concerned with the growing trust deficit with Mr. Mistry, but these were not being addressed,’ it said, in explanation of Mistry’s departure.

There are sure to be more recriminations in the coming days and weeks as the two parties trade press release blows. In the meantime, spare a thought for the families. Mistry’s sister is married to Noel Tata, half-brother of Ratan. That should make for some awkward get-togethers.

Image source: David Villareal Fernandez/Wikimedia


Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Want to encourage more female leaders? Openly highlight their achievements

A study shows that publicly praising women not only increases their willingness to lead, their...

Message to Davos: Don't blame lack of trust on 'society'

The reason people don't trust you is probably much closer to home, says public relations...

Dame Cilla Snowball: Life after being CEO

One year on from stepping back as boss of Britain's largest advertising agency, Dame Cilla...

How to change people's minds when they refuse to listen

Research into climate change deniers shows how behavioural science can break down intransigence.

"Paying women equally would cripple our economy"

The brutal fact: underpaid women sustain British business, says HR chief Helen Jamieson.

Why you're terrible at recruitment (and can AI help?)

The short version is you're full of biases and your hiring processes are badly designed....