UK firms: Raise VAT to cut deficit, not NICs

Business groups don't often call for tax hikes - but at the moment it's seen as the lesser of two evils.

Last Updated: 31 Aug 2010

UK firms are adamant that the Government needs to prioritise cutting the budget deficit – but they think a rise in National Insurance Contributions is a pretty dim way of doing it, according to the British Chambers of Commerce (we’re paraphrasing here). The trade body’s latest survey of UK firms reveals that although the majority are still worried about a double-dip recession, more than 40% want to see faster action on the deficit – but think that adding an extra 1% to VAT is a better option than a ‘tax on jobs’. Both main parties are supposedly thinking about raising VAT – but both know that they’ll alienate fewer voters by hiking NICs instead…

According to the BCC, three-quarters of UK firms don’t believe the recession is over for their business, while a similar proportion reckons the economy will slip back into negative territory before too long. However, they disagree with Alistair Darling that this is a good reason to leave the deficit-trimming until next year: 41% reckon that reducing the deficit should be the top priority for whoever wins the election this year. But the proposed 1% hike in NICs – due to kick in April next year – is not the way to do it, they argue. ‘Raising a damaging tax on business like NICs will be counter-productive,’ the BCC’s David Kern insists. ‘It will mean fewer jobs and less tax revenue in the long-term.’

A ‘less damaging’ option, they suggest (on the assumption that some kind of tax hike is inevitable), would be to increase VAT. Weekend newspaper reports suggested that both of the main parties are considering this after the election (although neither of them would dream of saying as much in public at this stage – a whopping across-the-board tax hike is no way to woo potential voters). The BCC reckons a 1% hike to 18.5% would raise about £4.5bn; throw in a few ‘targeted spending cuts’, and you’re not far off the extra £5.1bn the NIC hike is supposed to raise – but without the damaging effect on business.
Of course the BCC is a business group, so it would say that; consumer groups might argue that it’s neither fair nor sensible to shift the burden onto them. And numerically speaking, a VAT hike is likely to irritate a lot more people (not to mention its effect on inflation). On the other hand, growing businesses create jobs and drive recovery. So creating better conditions for growth - which means less red tape as well as a benign tax environment - will surely need to be at the top of the new Government’s agenda. But either way, it's going to hurt.

In today's bulletin:

Job cuts to soar again - with public sector hardest hit
UK firms: Raise VAT to cut deficit, not NICs
RBS hobbled by its largest shareholder?
The Sharp End: Cobblers to the gentry
MT Expert's Ten Top Tips: Act your way to the top

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

Should CEOs get political?

The protests that have erupted over George Floyd’s murder have prompted a corporate chorus of...

“You literally have to rewrite your job description”

One minute briefing: In hard times, your network becomes more important than ever, says Prezi...

5 bad habits to avoid when leading remotely

In a crisis, it can be hard to recognise when you've taken your eye off...

A top-level guide to scenario planning

COVID creates unprecedented uncertainty, but there are tried and tested ways of preparing for an...

Is it favouritism to protect an employee no one likes?

The Dominic Cummings affair shows the dangers of double standards, but it’s also true that...

Masterclass: Communicating in a crisis

In this video, Moneypenny CEO Joanna Swash and Hill+Knowlton Strategies UK CEO Simon Whitehead discuss...