Are under-25s really less productive?

Minister Matthew Hancock has drawn ire for saying under-25s won't get the National Living Wage as they're less productive - but is that true?

by Rachel Savage
Last Updated: 07 Oct 2015

In Matthew Hancock’s world, when you turn 25 you suddenly transform from an unproductive slacker to a super efficient worker, a veritable butterfly emerging from the chrysalis of yoof.

That’s a slight generalisation, but then Hancock is fond of those himself. Speaking at a fringe event at the Conservative Party conference yesterday, the cabinet office minister said the decision to not cover under-25s with the new National Living Wage was ‘an active choice’ (you'd hope politicians didn't decide policy by accident).

‘Anybody who has employed people knows that younger people, especially in their first jobs, are not as productive, on average,’ he said. ‘Now there are some who are very productive under the age of 25 but you have to set policy for the average. It was an active choice not to cover the under 25s.’

Predictably, the MP unleashed a social media backlash, with many tweeting examples of their hard work at a young age via the #at25 hashtag. Young parents, who are also set to lose out from the cuts to tax credits, were particularly incensed. But is there any truth in his comments?

The evidence either way is scant, but it’s fair to say people take some time to find their feet in their first job. However, that is also the case for someone of any age starting a new job. Meanwhile, young, energetic newbies may be perfect at producing the goods in entry-level jobs.

To use another generalisation, today’s young people (of which I am still one - just) don’t seem prone to slacking off, having grown up in the wilderness years after the financial crisis. Evidence for working 16-25 year-olds is, again, scarce. But today’s students work longer hours, drink less and take fewer drugs, while many take part-time jobs to fund their studies.

Of course, one could argue that mature workers are more productive, and that maturity usually does indeed come with age. However, there is evidence more diverse teams perform better – and one dimension of diversity is, of course, age. It also bears repeating that younger people are more likely to be digital savvy.

It also makes sense to recruit people to entry-level roles while they’re young. Aside from the aforementioned energy, research shows giving people their first job and/or training them increases loyalty and reduces staff turnover. And that helps improve productivity, which the UK really could use, not least through cutting recruitment costs.

Many companies have voiced concerns about the impact of introducing the National Living Wage, but it remains to be seen how it will actually work in practice. One possible consequence is companies actually end up recruiting more, cheaper young people. One would hope they then invest in them rather than firing them when they turn 25.

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

A simple cure for impostor syndrome

Opinion: It's time to stop hero-worshipping and start figuring out what greatness looks like to...

I was hired to fix Uber’s toxic culture - and I did. Here’s ...

Harvard’s Frances Frei reveals how you know when your values have gone rotten, and what...

Social responsibility may no longer be a choice

Editorial: Having securitised businesses’ loans and paid their wage bills, it’s not inconceivable the government...

What went wrong at Wirecard

And how to stop it happening to you.

Leadership lessons from Jürgen Klopp

The Liverpool manager exemplifies ‘the long win’, based not on results but on clarity of...

How to get a grip on stress

Once a zebra escapes the lion's jaws, it goes back to grazing peacefully. There's a...