Why is it always working women to blame?

A new study claiming working mums have unhealthier kids seems both unhelpful and misleading.

Last Updated: 31 Aug 2010

Just in case working mums haven’t been stigmatised enough, new research suggests that their kids end up being fatter, lazier and generally less healthy. The report, which is based on a study of 12,000 British children born between 2000 and 2002, claims that kids whose mothers work full-time have a worse diet and spend more time in front of the TV – even if said mums take advantage of employers’ flexible working arrangements. But despite the inevitable headlines that have ensued, the research clearly doesn’t show a causal link between the two – and even if it did, why are we pinning the whole thing on Mum?

On the face of it, it may seem plausible that working women have less time on their hands, which means less time for children and more chance of them slipping into bad habits. However, we’re pretty sceptical about reports like this. For a start, the study claims that the result holds true even if you adjust for various factors that could affect the results, like socioeconomic background. But the problem with any lifestyle study of this nature is that there are so many potentially distorting factors that it’s almost impossible to take them all into account.

And it’s worth emphasising that even the report’s authors admit that it doesn’t prove a causal link – working full-time doesn’t have to mean your kids are less healthy – merely a ‘definitive association’. So don't go sacking your childminder/ grandparents just yet.

What’s more, even if it was true, what are women expected to do about it? The authors note that 60% of British women with a child aged 5 or younger have gone back to work, and we suspect that many haven’t done so purely for their own benefit; these days, lots of families rely on two salaries. In fact, we’d be interested to see what impact a reduced family income has on a child’s life chances (notwithstanding all the caveats above). Same goes for a less fulfilled mother, for that matter.

The other interesting question is why so much of the coverage has been focused on working mums. As far as we can see, all of this research surrounds the benefits of having a stay-at-home parent of any flavour – yet the story is all about how working mums have fatter kids. There’s been a lot of progress made in breaking down the stigma that’s attached to working mothers, but these kinds of headlines aren’t terribly helpful.

We suppose there’s something to be said for this research if it encourages the Government and employers to give more thought to flexible working or parental leave policies, or if it funnels more money towards supportive health visitors – thus making it easier for women to build their work around their family lives. But generally, the whole thing strikes us a bit daft.

In today's bulletin:

Boost for Government, as Q2 'growth' better than expected?
Why is it always working women to blame?
Jessops survives - just - as HSBC takes pity on it
Editor's blog: The dangers of getting tough
Public sector cuts competition - who's won the bubbly?

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

A leadership thought: Treat your colleagues like customers

One minute briefing: Create a platform where others can see their success, says AVEVA CEO...

The ignominious death of Gordon Gekko

Profit at all costs is a defunct philosophy, and purpose a corporate superpower, argues this...

Gender bias is kept alive by those who think it is dead

Research: Greater representation of women does not automatically lead to equal treatment.

What I learned leading a Syrian bank through a civil war

Louai Al Roumani was CFO of Syria's largest private retail bank when the conflict broke...

Martin Sorrell: “There’s something about the unfairness of it that drives me”

EXCLUSIVE: The agency juggernaut on bouncing back, what he would do with WPP and why...

The 10 values that will matter most after COVID-19

According to a survey of Management Today readers.