Workplace rights: unfair dismissal

This year, some of the Coalition's employment law reform plans will come to fruition, including an increase in the period of time people have to work in a job before being protected from unfair dismissal.

by Michael Burd and James Davies
Last Updated: 11 Oct 2016

Currently one year, this could be raised to two years or possibly even three. Reduction of the qualifying period from two years to one was one of New Labour's early workplace reforms in 1999. A concrete proposal to reverse that would be politically symbolic, but would it necessarily be good news for business? There is no qualifying period for claims of unlawful discrimination (sex, race, age etc) and certain categories of 'automatically' unfair dismissal, such as whistleblowing and trade union and safety-related sackings. Employees with less than two years' service might resort to such avenues, which tend to be more complex and costly to defend than a standard unfair dismissal claim. A significantly longer qualifying period might also itself spawn legal challenges, on the basis that it discriminates against women - prompting unwelcome uncertainty for employers. Perhaps a case of more is less?

Michael Burd and James Davies are solicitors at Lewis Silkin LLP. Contact

Find this article useful?

Get more great articles like this in your inbox every lunchtime

How to use workplace conflict to your advantage

But beware the festering feud.

Efficient chickens, less stuff, more optimism: The real way to address climate change ...

What is dematerialisation, and why does it matter?

The 5 behaviours of charismatic leaders

How to become more inspirational (without having a personality transplant).

When should you step down as CEO?

Bob Iger's departure poses an unpopular question for bosses.

The death and resurrection of the premium customer

Top-end service is no longer at the discretion of the management.

What HS2 can teach you about project failure

And how you can prevent projects going astray.